Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About sublime

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  • Birthday 03/06/1985

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I think I shouldnt have used the word redone as it sounds like remade from scratch. I guess overhaul would have been a better term. I still think it sucks and itd bring a whole new dimension to the map in terms of range and stuff.
  2. jeez. even with the political stuff youd think itd be worth it. Idk.. I mean the russians got it back anyways and its a game -shrug- I just think itd really make the map like... itd be a new map almost you know?
  3. speaking of the map.. and the fact that theres a somewhat loose line from Su 27 Flanker to DCS... And the fact that Crimea is on the map - I never ever understood why they didnt flesh out Crimea. Even in the redone Caucauses map. Or even as a money upgrade - imagine the possibilities if they filled the Crimea with cities airfields etc. Itd change the entire balance of the caucauses map. Itd also make for way better campaigns as you could present the 2 as seperate nations in whatever form you like training missions *are essential* if ED doesnt do em someone will but theyre absolutely
  4. lol I meant mine but if theres a guarantee with multicrew Ill start a harvesting operation if thats what theyre into
  5. the f14 does amazing a2g, has a huge a2g payload, and is super lethal a2a. my 2 cents and you can fly with a person in it with you. its also way more fleshed out than the f16 - and if you have the viggen you know the quality HB brings
  6. anyone ? please? I just want my campaigns to work
  7. I highly doubt, unless it hits a wing stub, or very extremity on the front, (and doubtful then) any airframe around would survive a direct 57mm hit anywhere. Yes there could be freak instances of a 57mm AP round perhaps flying through a open side door and hitting glass or some weirdness, but otherwise if it hits the body I dont see it man. realistically not at all. front, pilots\body. middle the engine, body, rotor\ back the tail rotor or lines controlling it. I can pull freak pictures of western airframes too - the Israeli F15 etc. does this mean that its common? Lol no. likely? nope.
  8. just as I try to tell laymen about the A10 all the time. in america theres A LOT of people who (again ill harp on it) think the A10 is made to take several SAM hits and AAA hits and keep going to complete a mission. And they wont be swayed. they also seem to think that 'brrrt' changes everything. whats also pretty amusing is when the A10 was wayyyy newer in the 90s relatively large amounts of people didnt know wtf it even was. Its only been like the last 10 years that its gotten a 'mainstream' following.
  9. f**ing a man. the F4 really pissed me off too as well as the statement I read somewhere that said it was on 'permanent hold' just friggin say cancelled! I should have known when they announced it, it wasnt going to happen. IIRC it was going to be belsimtek or someone but they pulled a weird stunt and claimed they were working on like 10 or some crazy amount of planes. it was obvious even then itd never happen. I just cant believe noones made an F4... smh yeah... youre spot on. now I dont get excited whatsoever about upcoming modules until theyre literally released, or I see several vi
  10. that is indeed very odd. Ive honestly thought it was odd that they were able to get the goods on the typhoon to make a module. I wouldnt have dreamed of say a realistic F22 module or something. I think it must be the consortium however; I dont think its purely a strike aircraft thing. Maybe with Russia, but every country handles these things differently. Also ISTR in the HB forums them saying theyre trying to get permission from the companies that made the A6 to do a module or something and they need that first. The A6 is long retired, etc, so that seriously makes me think its all ab
  11. I think that was more because the round probably hit the wing... If a 57mm had hit the body or anything forget it.
  12. Aluminum donkey makes a good point, though I havent played in about 10 days so idk what you mean by the yellow black flashing . jesus that sounds lame. anyways this continual drive to announce theyre gonna make 25 new modules every few months - when introducing one module or major changes in a patch screws up all the current modules (or many, see the saga of the aim54 from heatblurs f14) - maybe they should ramp it down somewhat and work on whats already out. For example, they also are still filling out the F18, and the F16 idk even know whats going on with it. It just seems b
  13. I dont see it. as others have said they simply wont be able to get the info necessary. Su24s would be awesome but thats not whats being discussed. I highly doubt it, and if it was done it would be a module/game I wouldnt want as theyd have to simply guess at half the things they did. Heck even the F16 module saw a poor guy get arrested with F16A manuals for suspicion of espionage at an airport in Texas. IIRC the case got thrown out, but its not a position I personally would like to be in, whether America or Russia.
  14. *this* I try endlessly explaining the concept that an A10 has to stil be able to fly... to my fellow countrymen, many of whom remain unconvinced by me and think the A10 is totally entirely built like an M1A2, I.E made to take direct hits and continue its mission, even repeatedly, and also they know almost nothing about the A10 but know about the gun. its allllll about the gun to them. While the gun is 'cool' theres much more lethal stuff it carries.
  15. thanks man. I got more pictures but theyre more of the same as displayed there. Unfortunately I made some realllly bad life decisions in my teens/20s and lost everything several times over, including lots of usaf stuff my dad just left me like his flying helmet, slide rules, bla bla bla its a shame. ah well... hes passed and is at peace hopefully, finally.
  • Create New...