ineth

Maybe a destroyed Shelter or other destroyed buildings would rock. Also a new kind of bridge would rock. Maybe even a Ferries wheel like the one there is in Batumi in real life. As for vehicles.... Hovercrafts and other landing ships. Have an amazing day Hermano. Martin Zabel

New, if you want old i dont get it, we want the best long range striker and probably our only one to be an older version? For what? as i said before, i got no interest for this one really but i will get it to support the team that brought me wonderfull modules in the past hopine that they will work at one point in the M2k5.

OK Solved. S button did not work as quoted so i dug out some old rudders i had and put em on. Once i got the rudders on suddently the keyboard command for steering plus stick kicked in too. I am out of words here. I did not use the rudders for a year and it might had been some kind of hiden coflict. Go figure. Anyways. Tnx guys

Yeah absolutely. i get this from cold start. i thought i might have missed smt in the procedure. I maybe ought to had mentioned that i fly with sims since 1977 so i am kinda seasoned. Its the silly stuff, it allways is. isn't it?

have to check. i am currently reading this through my cellphone from work tnx man.

Pretty silly but still bugging me.. I cant use the noswheel on the M2000. i use the s button witch is bind by default and the bind stick button. The front wheel does not turn. Simple as that. I hope you got an idea on how to fix this cause its a shame for the money i spend on the module. Thanks for your time have a great day. :thumbup:

http://www.nmusafvirtualtour.com/full/tour-std.html I found this and i think it looks awesome. Would be nice if DCS could put it on FB to for others to see. Have fun all

i had huge issues too till i got https://fr-fr.facebook.com/116514731700204/videos/1104073232944344/ It is the DCS update utility by skatezilla. I am not to say that it was faster, but it got the job done where i had a problem with the conection being droped serverside on the last few bytes again and again and again.........

I sure hope so. Hormuz straights sounds a good idea historicaly at least. Though if you have flown EF2000 you will know that there is probably no better theater then Scandinavia.

While i am not a big fan (yet) of WWii planes i think we own it for historical reassons to include WWii planes like the Sturmovic and the Zero. Especially the Zero. But what we have ZERO of and is definetly needed is Heavy Birds like any transporter or AWACS-Refueler. This leaves open the topic of multicrew capabilities even though i feel it is way to fresh to talk about any such topic in detail due to the highly specialized nature of those roles. But.... WWii Bombers..... now that would be the multicrew planes of my choice. After all the easiest thing to ask from anyone to do is sit in a cannon tower and shoot the living shit out of things comming in your direction.

My guess is that with all that panspermy of planes out we ought to see sooner or later maps of Viet Nam and Korea too. In 10 years from now DCS will be the crown jewel of the crown jewel of Flight sims.

Both should get you where you want to be, from there i guess it is mostly GPU what makes the difference in performances. That being said i would like to add since both cover your needs in DCS try to get the better one for your other gaming needs. As i said. DCS seems to be covered either way.

Probably millions. Us who print a Yellow pages sized Quick Guide till we get to the minivan sized manuals are probably under 100k

Well i guess we all thought at one point in time of having a full blown military simulation where everyone would participate on the battlefield. Others as infantry, others as artilery, flight, vehicle or tank simulation and the likes. Unfortunately we have to realise that this would also mean to make it anything else then a smash arena and give it a sense of realism it would also need a strategic part where players as officers would assign ermmmmm assignments and i am uncertain what it would look like if not everyone did his part. THis would make sense if there was a multiserver kinda state with a level of proggresion according with the way a player is playing rather then the actual performance. On a big scale this would draw the same attention if not more as the good old game HARPOON did having been introduced as a learning tool in Annapolis. WHat we need to keep in mind though is that DCS is a small company and we need to stick with it hoping that smt in a small scale of pure awesomnes will arise in a few decades, plus it would need a server probably bigger then the CCP EVE Online mammoth that is designed to hold as many as one million players concurrently. (Only saw about 70.000 though at the same time) cheers

I mentioned a another jewel of past days aviation but it struck no response. I will throw in this wonderfull picture and let that image do the talking for me. http://photo.net/learn/airshow/images/geebee.jpg