Jump to content

VGlusica

Members
  • Content Count

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About VGlusica

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday 01/19/1977

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    P3D
    DCS
  • Location
    New York
  • Interests
    N/A

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Dear ED, Your decision to lock weapons .LUA files is one of the most inexplicable decisions you have ever made. Your statement: "On popular demand we have locked the LUA files relating to weapon systems," I suspect to be patently false. I have spent some time combing forums available to us here and I have failed to find one entry calling for this. As a matter of fact, as recently as a couple of months back you repeatedly assured the modding community that you would not do this. I am not part of the "online community." I am, however, aware that "online community" and server oper
  2. I have to agree I think community modding is near death. I personally don't see any reason to restrict access to these files. I understand some potential issues with online flying (I personally never fly online), but that is easily solved with IC checks, so I don't see what the issue is. I do also understand tech support problems with modded games, but again all ED should do is make it clear that they will not support modded game. Not sure where this is all going, but I do hope that ED will at least give us an explanation.
  3. No official explanation or alternative that I am aware. This is actually what bothers me the most, some sort of explanation would be more than warranted. I don’t want to level too much criticism at this point, this might just be an oversight, as it did happen in the past.
  4. I went through the entire directory and cannot find anything like what we were used to. What I did find seems encrypted.
  5. For me this is more than disappointing. Taking away our ability to mod those files is entirely uncalled for. I wonder what their reasoning behind this might be.
  6. I did a little snooping around just to see what changes were made to different files and these were significant. I also hope RAZBAM will provide us a solution. However, I do tend to agree with Hawkeye about their efficacy when it comes to resolving issues.
  7. So I had a chance to do a bit of testing and the mod works, however, you do end up loosing some symbols on the stores page. Imacken thank you for your efforts trying to sort this out.
  8. I did some testing and I get the same artifacts. After creating a backup I deleted the indicator folder and replaced it with the downloaded one. I am wondering if there might be another file somewhere that need to be reverted. Maybe materials.lua, or something in the displays folder.
  9. Imacken thank you for posting that, I have some time later today, so I will do some testing.
  10. Is it possible that someone could post an entire cockpit folder for those of us who want to revert and don’t have it.
  11. I dont have it handy right now, but I believe there is a chart that you can use to figure out which load would give you unacceptable asymmetric load. When I have a chance I will look it up and see if I can give you guys a basic idea without running afoul of any rules. One thing to keep in mind is that in a certain flight regime you might end up in a situation where your flight controls do not have enough authority to overcome the load asymmetry.
  12. There does exist an actual limit for a landing with asymmetric load. For carrier landing where gross weight is 33,000 lbs or less, asymmetric load cannot exceed 17,000 ft-lbs. If the gross weight is above 33,000 lbs than the maximum is 14,500 ft-lbs. As per NATOPS.
  13. Excellent! Thank you very much.
  14. Merci! You guys are awesome. Every time I see a new mod by you it makes me smile. Thank you for your hard work.
  15. Outstanding mod, please keep them coming. Thank you very much for your work.
×
×
  • Create New...