funkyfranky

Well, to stay in your picture, at least my neighbor demonstrated that it is possible to build a "great" house using concrete. Of course, all flight sims are different but they share some common problems and challenges. The X-plane result shows that this genre can indeed profit from Vulkan. I find that encouraging - nothing more nothing less :)

Preliminary Vulkan "Speed Testing" results in X-plane [source FB]. Could be useful to get a rough(!) idea about the expected performance increase in DCS.

Erste Vulkan "Speed Testing" Resultate in X-plane. Quelle FB. Eventuell geeignet um ein grobes Gefühl für die zu erwartenden Verbesserungen in DCS zu bekommen.

Sehe ich (im Prinzip) auch so. Auf der anderen Seite scheint mir, dass man bei ED et al. in einigen Bereichen gerade ganz schön Umdenkt. Zum Beispiel wurden offenbar alle "Verbannten" begnadigt :shocking: Ich bin jemand, der seine Kritikpunkte, wenn überhaupt, eher subtil formuliert (bzw. beschränke mich inzwischen sowieso lieber auf das melden von Bugs). Aber so etwas geht oft unter. Insofern scheint es leider(!) notwendig zu sein, dass jemand "auf den Putz haut", um etwas zu bewegen. Das ist nicht mein persönlicher Stil, aber offenbar der erfolgversprechendere - wie gesagt, leider.

Yup, but should be fixed now in the very latest dev Moose.lua (as of 60 seconds ago ;)).

LOL ;)

+1

Your error messages say version of the recovery tanker is 1.0.5, while the current version is 1.0.9. You get errors because you are using a Moose.lua version which does not include the functions you are using.

Jabbers Meinung zum EA der Viper

Danke! :thumbup:

Wird der linke Hardpoint in unserer Viper genutzt? Bin gerade dabei meine Buttons zu mappen und frage mich, ob ich mir den Schalter zur Aktivierung sparen kann...

Big thanks to the donor from here as well :thumbup: (Needless to say (hopefully) that I would not have suggested to donate in my earlier post, if I had not already donated a fair amount myself. As a community we are powerful enough to support this great project, even if ED does fully realize its potential.)

Good stuff! Crossing fingers, too :)

Well, that's the latest release version, yes. But it's ancient. The good stuff is in the development version :) https://github.com/FlightControl-Master/MOOSE_INCLUDE/tree/develop/Moose_Include_Static Try the example mission https://github.com/FlightControl-Master/MOOSE_MISSIONS/tree/develop/OPS%20-%20Airboss/Caucasus/BOS-100%20-%20Stennis%20Hornet%20and%20Tomcat

Have you guys ever considered to donate a few bugs to support f4l0's hard work so he does not have to buy the modules out of his own pocket all the time? He surely deserves it :) Of course, ED et al. could and should provide the modules for free to him. But obviously this is not happening. So we as a community have to stand in.

If you take that line out and the script works, your Moose.lua is too old as this feature was add later.

Yeah, a C130 is indeed too big for Creech. Therefore, DCS will despawn it without any event fired the moment it lands and it won't be possible to spawn it at Creech. Hence, in this case, the option to commute is unfortunately not working. I'd suggest to take it out. If you really want send a C130 to Creech, you can use c130_1:RespawnAfterLanding() As to why a C130 is too big for Creech, that's something the DCS devs need to answer ;)

When the DCS weather gets an overhaul, it would be nice to add more scripting API functions to extract current weather information. Currently, it is "only" possible to get information on wind, temperature and pressure. For example, to build a meaningful ATIS, information on cloud coverage, fog, dust, visibility, rain, thunderstorm, etc and maybe the active runway would be great. Thanks :) PS: Here is an ATIS implementation example. But most information is strictly only valid for static weather as it hast to be extracted from the env.mission variable.

Danke @ram0506, sehr informativ!

Nein, der Verkäufer garantiert, dass die Ware beim Übergang frei von Mängeln ist. Der Kunde muss da nichts überprüfen. Falls Mängel bestehen, muss der Verkäufer Nacherfüllen. Siehe BGB §437 und §439 :smartass:

Das ist aber ein DCS bug?! So eine persönliche Einstellung sollte definitiv keine globalen Auswirkungen auf das KI Verhalten haben. Spätestens im MP, wo jeder mit anderen Einstellungen fliegt, wird das undurchsichtig. Du bist Dir da wirklich sicher?

Did we? We had a system to (dis-)credit a person for a specific post but not a post itself. I think it would be useful to rate good/bad posts independent of who actually posted. There are simply too many to read them all. If I could read though the best posts of a day/week/month I would save a lot of time and probably not miss a lot of good info (or read a lot of rubbish).

Easter egg

Could simply be that the valid airports don't have any parking spots specifically for helos? Many airports actually have not.