Jump to content

Eros

Members
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Eros

  1. Hello all,

     

    I put the Dora in a "Slow flight - Minimum Controlled Airspeed" (with full flaps down) configuration:

    remain straight and level by keeping the attitude appropriate to keep the airspeed at the minimum + power setting to keep the VSI steady at 0.

    Then the aircraft starts to wobble and the nose initiate a right rotation around it's longitudinal axis.

    I'm guessing due to p-factor but wobbling like that seems weird.

    Is it suppose to be doing that?

     

    I could upload a video showing it later if required.

  2. Yes and it should be a full AFM/EFM.

    But I think the campaign that comes with the module must be top notch and dedicated to training; navigation, proper ATC coms training (DCS II), taxiing within busy airports with high traffic flow, how to read airport holding patterns and going into holding patterns, etc...

    Basically the trainer aircraft should have a highly detailed flight training campaign that exists in a constantly busy air traffic environment.

    Yep I would buy something like this.... once.

     

    +1

     

    But i'd like a Cessna

     

    To all of those not liking it unless it carries bombs:

    Why would you like to block your favorite sim from having more aircraft (like GA)

    which will attract with proper environment more people in it like FSX flyers?

    Yes, DCS is a combat simulator but most of all, it's a simulator unlike any other in physics.

    Why would you not want it to expand? Will this block your favorite aircraft?

    I think not since we have 3rd party developers doing it already (like Razbam's T-6 Texan II)

  3. I think he means IL-2 like cooperative missions.

    Missions that start all together from the ground, each side has an offence and a defence and the two sides are split according to these objectives, also you can't respawn after being shot down you have to wait for the next mission to start.

  4. Yeah .. I think this kind of opinion masquerading as advice is bull ...

    People have different levels of what they'll accept when playing any sim ... so far I think the responses have been pretty reasonable w.r.t. what people have said regarding the choices they're making.

    Obviously for you the existing servers are fine. For me there's a 400 + ping rate that makes it untenable most of the time ... what I'm saying is that your *bull* statement is thoughtless.

    For others it might also be the loss of immersion because of a lack of WWII units etc.

     

    Ofcourse the existing servers are fine. Even at this point of development of WW2, the servers are doing a great job creating different scenarios and mission types. Yes the "bombers" are An AI or whatever, but it is still a big plane capable of bombing and going down when you shoot it. And to me ofcourse, it doesn't make a difference if i destroy with a bomb a visual model of a ww2 tank or a modern era tank existing right now in DCS. It's stil la tank and the best we can get right now. Isn't that the point?To create something that fit our needs with what we ve got and have fun? It's not like we play world of tanks and we see them in detail diving on them with 400 kph.

    And the ping? Well, it's your ping. I never had any ping problems. Is it just me?

    I didn't mean to offend anybody with my statement, i guess i'm just bitter :) And words as well as the differences of native language

    make things sound different

     

    Bottom line is the reasons are many and varied, but one thing is clear; people who respond to this thread obviously want DCS: WWII to become a reality sooner rather than later and your comment is not helpful. :mad:

     

    Isn't it what we really want? To make DCS WWII a thing as fast as it can be since we enjoy it so much?

    I want every WW2 plane on DCS and i want it now! lol

    i don't get the point of that statement. :pilotfly:

    • Like 1
  5. I personally think visibility is OK-ish. Sure it needs improvement, but it's not that terrible.

     

    If you go out to fly a real plane and join the traffic pattern where 2 other aircraft are doing their landings as well, it's not that easy to spot them..and they are WHITE!

    Imagine if they had proper camo!

    I think it needs a very sharp eye to spot an small aircraft beyond 4nm. And to spot them you need to know where to look at, mostly by listening to the radio.

     

    What i DO think needs change in DCS World, is the scaling of everything. I think it needs a slight zoom in to everything. I have a 24 inch monitor and the size of...stuff..seems smaller for the distance you look at. Something like 2 clicks on the slow zoom key seems to do it for me.

     

    I think saying i won't play until a proper theater comes out for immersion and all, is kind of bull..

    There are WW2 exclusive servers like the JG27 FlyingLegends that fix the visibility proplem, but i think only to make it easy for everyone to spot and not up to realistic standards. But temporarily, it fixes the problem. If everybody just join, instead of waiting, it would be fun for everybody who is really into WW2 aircraft. More people = more fun = not boring. Try to contribute to the community and not just wait for everything to be served for you ready.

  6. You should follow the traffic pattern when you approach an airfield to land.

    It is described in the training campaign of the P-51D.

    Try to follow the pattern. That is until you figure it all out and you know by experience your distance from the runway and the proper final path that you need to follow to land successfully.

    Also proper round-out and hold off after passing the runway threshold help you slow the aircraft down to stall just inches above the runway.

×
×
  • Create New...