Jump to content

MAD-MM

Members
  • Posts

    1229
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by MAD-MM

  1. What kind of Klimov Engines are used for the MI-24? Seem's first Generation A,B are Powered by TW3-117 "A". They upgraded the Engines for better High and Hot cabaility during Afghanistan War to TW3-117 "W". Did the TW3-113 WM Engines found there way in the MI-24P or what kind of can we expect?
  2. Muss sagen der Camaro schaut schon verdammt gut aus, fast ein bisschen neidisch..
  3. The disadvantages from the MI-24 Yak Chin Gun was realy showing up in service in Afghanistan i assume. Soviet Forces showed up till the end of 1979. Second there was not Gun that was fitting at this time to the MI-24, P-Version Gun is a extend Version from the Su-25 adapted for the MI-24. There some changes trough the Afghan war under the Hood, new high and Hot Klimov Turbine Engines for the V and P Version
  4. Klingt am Anfang komisch, aber eigentlich gar nichts. Waffen scharf machen (Aim 54), warten bis im Radar die Ziele zum Blinken anfangen, und dan die Raketen abfeuern. Ziele werden dan nacheinander beschossen.
  5. Bist du sich das du deine Raketen im TWS Modus feuerst? Weil wen du Jester anweist ein Ziel aufzuschalten, ist es nur noch im STT Singel Track Modus und greift nur das Ziel an das von dir zugewiesen ist. TWS schaltet er nur im Radar automatische die Ziele auf die dan Blinken nach Gefährlickeit.
  6. Bulba did you know the MI-24 was equipped with the R-60"M" later one, or was this even Possible? R-60M had now nitrous cooled Seeker, should be consider more effectiv then the non cooled Variant tested by TurkVO. Is there visual difference between R-60 and R-60M? R-60 old Seeker? R-60M new Seeker?
  7. Have seen this Bombsight called OPB in a MI-8 of the NVA, but aparrently it is not realy small Device, borrowed from a WW2 Bomber. Are you sure they ever fitted this in a cramped MI-24? Think most of the Time they dropped the Iron Bombs by Eyeballing.
  8. Think there is no other Designation, think it is simple a Option by Customer who recived the MI-24. Also this not a huge lose compare to the SPO-10 in Helicopter. Even when you look the MI-24 P in Syria they still miss the SPO-15 Fairings. But so far could not find any Russian MI-24 with this Fairings, could also not find any reliable Source about this but seem's the russian didnt need it. same story Ka-50
  9. Would not go so far... The Antenna Fairings on the Pictures from Pepin are only needed for the SPO-15, think i read somewhere in the Russian Thread the DCS MI-24 will equipped with the more cheaper SPO-10 what the Russian MI-24 used in Service.. Edit: Grodlund was faster
  10. So far i read out of the many Post's, only the export Version's of the MI-24 use the SPO-15.
  11. Oh very nice...Hind is finally Incoming.:thumbup:
  12. Mit Mach 0.9 waren beide in der transsonischen Strömung, bei der F-18 Mirage hab ich keine Ahnung wie genau die Geschwindigkeit ausgelesen nur Analog über Pito, oder Digital?. (F-18 GPS?) Das vielleicht der auschlaggebende Einfluss auf die Unterschiedlichen Geschwindigkeiten?
  13. After seen the video from Syria Map whith the short of the what i belive is new 3D Model of the MI-24 it is complete without Lipa infared Jammer. On the MI-8 it is there but only static without Function. From what i read it was only effective against first Generation Manpads Redeye for example. DCS consits only newer MANPADS, so this have not realy a use currently. But in the longer run for Afghanistan Map would be not more usefull to make old MANPADS then completly remove the Lipa?
  14. I tryed the Campaign, was only flying the First Mission so far, but like the Style of the Campaign thx. In the first mission with the old Carrier, after i crossed the last WP (WP1) was not able to use Tacan back to the Carrier, it is not showing anything 76X for the Stennis on the last leg back to the Carrier.
  15. Have now same issue since last Patches for the Tomcat 2 Months ago probably, same thing with the MIG-15 since release.. Currently the only two Planes with that lagg Issue...have two FFB Sidewinder Sticks, both the same...
  16. And no evidence it enough reasonable to put a since fiction weapon under the MI-24 P Hind? Back to your nice Logic Diagramm, why the send the MI-24 P in to service with R60 Weapons that block a complete weapon station for ground Weapons, meanwhile the could hang the well adopted Igla. Mi-24 P was allready in Production when the first man portable IGLA arrived, on military Equipment it is not plug in hope it will work. Need considerable testing adope Hardware such as Pylons and Software to such things. Mission design is fare more Intressting, to go with this wad you had not any fanci stuff that could might be Happen.
  17. How did you come to this conclusion, apart from your personal Expirience Phil?
  18. With the release of the Dora, it was common ED released some intressting Helpfull stuff what you can use to Fly and Dogfight, like Instant Turnrate continious Turn Rate for the varius Warbirds. But this is not case anymore, why dont know this is not anymore happen, to much Pointless Disscussion on the same thing over and over probably. With the release of the Dora Dogfighting the P-51 was doable at normal Weights, slightly higher Sustained Turnrate at medicore Speeds + Climb Rate but it was requesting higher Skill becauseof the bad accelerating Stalls and low Speed Turn was also Bad. (back then I know only handfull of People that was able of doing so). This Information is still visible in this Forum as Diagramm, when look out for hard facts and not XY can not do this because i am not able to do so... But there lot more that knows only ED or Yoyo, about Induced Drag Prob Effencie so on, so you can not see the hole story what happen... But dont know what changed, because this still top "Secret" Policie about Flight Models but everyone is welcome to test out the follow stuff it self: By 6% of Fuel in the Dora and 100% Fuel in P-51 will give the same Amount of Wingload, the Dora have around 1.35 Clmax at 15 AOA and the P-51 have around 1.2 clmax at "SUSTAINED" (i know what is comming). Dora Split Flaps are pretty bad compare to P-51 camber Flaps of the P-51, so this will only work against AI. Not mention the Climb Rate, dont know it right know from FF for this Takeoff Weights but should be significat difference in favour for the Dora. Feel free to Test it, at least I am not able to do something usefull in Dora anymore, absolute struggle (getting old i know) But Boom&Zoom with the Dora that have the worst Accelerating Stalls and high Wingload, for me it's absolute Boring and counter productive to use the Dora in this manner, that can spitfire and P-51 away more better. Can see clearly how hopeless the moste People crusing around the Server without scoreing any kills and try to force something. (yes it is fast wow)
  19. Yes but there is no actual Hind in the Russian Army you can find with something like a IGLA under the Wing. The first apperence of IGLA's was on the Ka-52 and Mi-28 in the past century. Dont think for US more likley they dont spend time an Money to integrate IGLA's in to the Hind (Hardware and Software that was never developed) to simulate something that the Enemy never had. After it is a Training Chopper to Simulate War Games, for me it's more reasoneable a Device to Simulate Attacks. But oblivios can be wrong, because there is not future Information to this Device.
  20. So far in can read out of the Russian Forum, they try to implement the R-60. But it will be there on release is unkown. Pretty Hilarious Storys about this Missle, because Russian Pilots did not have Night Vision Googles in the Afghanistan War, they tryed to pick up Heat Signatures in with R-60 in Night Operations. But success was realitive small, this was the kind of better then Nothing. By the Way there to the Picture tow sides before, like WinterH said the US Army MI-24 that probably Laser Tec stuff to simulate Training. There is no Russian Hind with this Kind of tube below the Hard Points. And P Version we get with SPO-10, was in the Time Frame of Strela Missiles at best. God Side for Technical Information in Englisch, z,b 16 Shturm Missles loadout in the NVA. https://www.16va.be/4.2_les_mi-24_part1_eng.html
  21. Heißt Engine RPM Decrease/Increase
  22. Hallo Kalle, Zum AFN-2 das funktioniert leider nicht, wurde bis jetzt nie richtig funktionierend Umgesetzt. (Signalquelle fehlt, Frequenzen usw.) Es macht nur kurze Ausschläge wenn du die Inner und Outer Marker beim Airfield der Funknavigation überfliegst aber das wars auch schon. Ja Prob Pitch der A8 sollte Funktionieren, von Auto auf Man umstellen und dan noch in der Steuerung RPM decrease und increase belegen, dan kannst entsprechend deine RPM Manuell anpassen. Ich hab die Channel Map nicht, kann sein das noch anderst ist. Auf den restlichen Karten ist die magentische Deklination drin, wenn du im Editor mit dem Lineal einen Strich ziehtst, kommt der rwK raus wie du beschreiben hast, und minus mal minus gibt Plus also 10 Grad dazu (beachte Datum im Editor 1944 war die Deklination noch anderst) sollte Passen. Gruß MAD
  23. Thx Fri, somehowe had the mindset i have seen this Collective before as Aftersale part, but found his ED Post with the self made Cockpit so pretty nice done.
×
×
  • Create New...