Jump to content

MAD-MM

New damage model tests
  • Content Count

    1186
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

About MAD-MM

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  • Birthday 03/02/1963

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    main WW2 and Helos
  • Location
    Germany
  • Interests
    Alles was Flügel hat

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Would say shooting in hover was only impractical, 30 mm with his Barrel Lenght is a heavty Caliber and mounted on the Side of the Fuselage. Would assume in hover there is not enough directional Stability to fire gun without the complete Heli turns sideways from the Blast.
  2. Wie gesagt Reisegeschwindigkeit ist auch das was Nirvi oben Beschrieben hat 1.1 ATA, um so schneller die Maschine wurde um so mehr Kraft war Richtung "Drücken" wie im Test. Die DCS K4 hat auch +2 Trimmung Nasenlastig, aber das wird halt aufgezert durch die Schwerpunktverlagerung der K4 durch den Methanol Tank. Irgedwo im Text steht auch da Sie die letzten Flugmanöver mit Abschwung eingeleitet haben, also halbe Rolle und "ziehen"... Btw. die Trimm Eigenschaften wurden später anhand eines deutschen Dokumentes bestimmt, früher war es das russische 2015 oder so und w
  3. @Jafferson Hier ist der Test dazu zum selber nachlesen.... http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/me109/Me_109_Dive_Test.pdf Der Spielraum der Trimmung in der 109 ist einfach limitiert, aus dem Grund das die Kiste sonst bei Nasenlastiger Trimmung nicht mehr aus dem Sturz abfangen kannst weil die Handkraft nicht ausreicht zum Ziehen. Das nichts zu tun was an der Flossenverstellung möglich wäre, und im gegensatz zu DCS war die Trimmung fast nicht mehr beweglich bei Hochgeschwindigkeit. Einfach ein Sicherheitsaspekt das sich die Piloten nicht umbringen konnten.
  4. The AI is allways go in a slow Speed Turn Fighting, thats where the MIG is a little bit stronger with his better Climb Rate. But against a proper Flown F-86 in the most cases it is a Steelmate. Most F-86 Pilots will unlikley go in a close Dogfight and they can Engage/Disengage when they want. F-86 is faster without doing a Headstand at Mach 0,95 and can do high substain G Maneuvers without Blackout you are not able to follow or you have to tab allways the Speed Brake. MIG 15 nearly requires Teamwork or Surprise. Was able to secure one Kill in a Dogfight on the Korea Server on the Weekend
  5. Dont know why some of you so keen of flying around with additional MW50 Tank that probably add again 200 kg on the Netto Weight of the 190 even make the Handling worse, so why you need this? 190 was allready running on high Octane C3 Fuel compare to the B4 from the 109 There is not the tienest bit of Information out there the 190 was ever flying with MW-50. (exept Wikipedia not a source) When exactly they use C3 Fuel injection or not is little bit obscure More the Controversy all written towards the end of the War: MW50 dont needed C3 was enough
  6. Es gibt einen test zu Hochgeschwindigkeitsversuchen mit der Me-109, eine F-Version die während des Testes auf G-Stand gebracht wurde. Bedenke die G-Version hatte noch keinen 115 Liter Methanol Tank hinter dem Schwerpunkt. Wurde auch viel mit der Bügelkante während des Test am Höhenruder probiert, die Option haben wir nicht in DCS. In dem Fall würde ich sagen war Flugleistung vor Handling Eigenschaften und Komfort des Piloten.
  7. The Missiles as you mentioned and Engine's will be probably also Klimov TW3-117 VM, (High-alt Modernized) compare to the Soviet used the V Version in the 80s. This are that indicates a early Russian Version, but even 90s there are so many possible Scenarios where the LIPA are still Thing, think ED can not convince me every non Military Organisation that was Fighting for example in Caucasus/chechnya was able to get there Hands on brand new IGLA's Manpads. That time Russian millitary was not able self to afford such Things.
  8. Lipa ("Липа") jammer will not be implemented. Alex claims that this system is outdated, hasn't been installed on any Mi-24P for many years, and is useless in DCS (doesn't have any suitable threats). That's again make's no sense at all, by 2021 the Russian Army knows it self there former Soviet MI-24P are not any more up to Date and try to Replace/Update it so far the Rubels rolls. After we getting a Modul that's pargon is soviet MI-24 as it roled from the Factory 1984, what hinders me to make 1985 Mission in DCS where the Lipa was brand new and effective in its Role? So far re
  9. The A8 realy suffer from it's take off Weight, its heavyer then D9 with less Power. The Handling suffers compare to earlier Anton Versions, the late A4 for example have the same Horsepower then our A8 +600kg additional Takeoff Weight. (Aux Fuel Tank, Armor). Currently the Plane with the highest Wingload in DCS, the P-47 have less Wingload (support slow climbs and slow Turnfights) that what matters. And so far i remember IL-2 uses for Clmax 1.56 without Flaps (your max Lift Coefficient) what is out of from the Fairy Tale hours, dissicused allready alot here. Take callculater and compare th
  10. Hey as said was two Patches before end of December i asume, where the Engine was after 2 Loops gone. The Fuel Pressure is now stable again works fine your Ninja Fix, but the Random Engine Size as in my Track was before the Fuel Pressure Drop thing and is still Present. Two different things to clarify.
  11. Still there, after 33 Mins the Engine Quit. Normandy Dogfight Mission after Fighting the P-51 simple flying around. Replay checked, should be working but the File is to big to share here... https://www.file-upload.net/download-14426251/LastMissionTrack.trk.html
  12. Thats true was not able to loop 2 Times without Engine sizure, but since last Patch is gone...tryed no serval Times the Normandy Dogfight Mission and the Engine was holding pretty well together...but thats is not enough Testing that randomly Dora Engine failures now complete gone...was not flying to mutch Dora in the past...
  13. Some sort of LOD Problem, the Dora have the same Problem and switching between different Paintschemes of the Propeller Spinner...
  14. Is not supposed the RWR SPO-10 System that he talks trough as IFF Transponder at @36:46 for example?
  15. Good dam we getting old, think the Money raised by Luthier was not enough for one seriouly working DCS Plane. After failing the Project ED took over it. Only Plane what doesnt come from the raised Found was P-51. Was home Project from some ED Members. At least Luthier kicked the Door open for WW2. Only little bit sad about Me-262 from technical Standpoint to fly the first Jet Fighter, but the Combat expierince is rather Boring.
×
×
  • Create New...