Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Dragon89

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday December 4

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    Flanker 2.5, LockOn, DCS, F/A-18 Hornet Korea, NovaLogic Comanche Gold, NovaLogic MiG-29, NovaLogic F-16, Falcon BMS
  1. Fantastic to hear! Hopefully you'll include static & mobile coastal missile battery defenses like the 4K51 'Rubezh', the 4K40/SPU-35B 'Redut', and the 4K44 'Utyos' as seen below http://www.ausairpower.net/V-MF/Styx-PKRK-Rubezh-MAZ543M-TELAR-6S.jpg https://weaponsystems.net/system/139-4K51+Rubezh http://www.ausairpower.net/V-MF/SPU-35B-Redut-Sepal-TEL-1S.jpg http://www.ausairpower.net/V-MF/SPU-35B-Redut-Sepal-TEL-2S.jpg http://www.ausairpower.net/V-MF/Utyos-Sepal-Launch-1S.jpg http://www.ausairpower.net/V-MF/Utyos-Sepal-Launch-2S.jpg Also, I would
  2. As a current munitions systems personnel in the USAF, I can concur that GBU-38s and GBU-31(V/1)s typically have the DSU-33, and the GBU-31(V/3)s always have nose cups installed in the front & the fuze installed in the rear since it's a penetrator/bunker buster.
  3. That is one, gorgeous Su-17M4, especially with those Kh-29Ts! Looking forward to support this project!
  4. +1 The Taiwan Strait, partial of the Korean peninsula (due to huge density of the ROK), and the East Sea (Sea of Japan) would also be excellent additions for DCS.
  5. Nothing like a good ol' Google search. The T-64 does look bad-a$$, especially the BV model.
  6. +1 I'm surprised the T-64 has not been added to DCS, especially the "BV" variant.
  7. Dragon89


    It sure is. They basically showed the US how to make better F-16s.
  8. Dragon89


    Like TLTeo stated, it was the first fighter with AESA. So no, it is NOT a block C.
  9. Metal Gear Solid vibes! SNNNNAAAAKKKKEEEE!!!!!
  10. Your statement here just proves why nukes should definitely not be in DCS, and it's also a good thing you're not in high command of the military, or in the military at all.
  11. I remembered when it was Flanker 2.0/2.5, a combat sim that was ahead of its time in late 90s - early 2000s. That was when the Crimea peninsula was the play area. Same thing with LOMAC, except it extended to the Caucasus region. Unfortunately, we won't see the Crimea area in detail, unless a 3rd party developer might be able to re-create that map.
  12. Reminds me of the good ol' days of playing Flanker 2.5
  13. THANK YOU! The F-15E (or C variant) is NOT carrier compatible in any way, whatsoever; no carrier landings, and no carrier takeoffs.
  14. BINGO!! Same here, although I would prefer a high fidelity MIG-29K just so that it'll be the equal of the F/A-18C in DCS. I miss flying the MiG-29K in Flanker 2.5.
  • Create New...