Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BIOLOG

  1. Right, I don't know exactly what happened on this thread but I got 3 statements to make:


    1)Game will be released when it is ready, and not earlier. No amount of ranting is going to solve that. Full stop.


    2)Kenan, check your PM's


    3)Next person who swears gets a day's vacation, one after next - 2, and so on untill all sharp-toungue's over here are disposed of.


    Does anyone have any quesions?





  2. It was his final warning last time, and I was the one who gave it. So, while your're enjoying your 10 days of well-deserved rest, I suggest you concider the following:


    1)Buying yourself a silencer

    2)Use the following tactic when writing future posts: Read the thread, think whether post is necessary TWICE, write your post, POLITELY, MAKING SURE THAT YOU DON'T OFFEND ANYONE, think whether your post is necessary AGAIN, checking that your post is polite AGAIN, and then clicking a submit button.


    And God forbid I get any more emails, about your childish behavior, cause if I do, I will get your *** out of these forums once and for all.


    Your last post was disspeakable (pardon bad spelling), and extremely ungrateful to someone who is spending so much of his time, trying to improve the Sim for the community.


    Sorry if I seem a bit impolite, everyone, but I'm slightly "annoyed" with "someone" at this time.

  3. Oh god... Now don't think that this is exclusive list but...


    * LHX (must have been something like 286)

    * F-19

    * Raptor

    * Novalogic MiG-29, F-16, F-22

    * Flanker 2, 2.5, 2.51

    * LOMAC, FC, BS

    * Ka-52: Team Alligator

    * F/A-18 Operation Iraqi Freedom

    * Il 2 and it's subsequent addons

    * Eurofighter Typhoon + addon (loved that game, graphics was awesome, although FM and futuristic scenarious sucked)

    *Battle of Britan

    *Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator 1/2/3/2002/2004

    *Slipstream 5000 (not really a sim, but fun!)

    *Striking Force

    *F-16 Fighting Falcon (electronic failures were rather amusing!)


    *X-Plane 6


    *Red Tornado

    *Falcon 4 (very briefly me thinks)

    *Jetfighter 4,5 (possibly 3)


    Possibly missed some. Some of the above titles, are only memories from childhood (LHX, mmmm), some didn't stay on harddrive very long, others keep on reappearing in it from time to time...


    Lol, I know I'm sad....:music_whistling:

  4. He-heh. Here is some memories from weapon system beta testing mission I was doing: Get yourself a MiG-29 and put a couple of FAB-500 on it, then fly at 10-25 meters (25 is better, at least you'll be able to fly for a couple of seconds, or fall rather) and drop the bombs, while doing about 700. Now I don't remember exact ranges mut it might still work at about 50 meters, and you may be able to fly faster, but not sure.





  5. Chill out everyone :) . There will always be ppl who exploit the internet to be rude and behave like smart***es. However these ppl should geneally be ignored, as their behavior can most often be attributed to their lack of life, if you see what I mean... I think an old Russian saying comes true here "The dog is barcking, and the wind blows it away". Hmm, I hope that made sence.





    • Like 1
  6. Right, the only reason I'm not closing this, is because it was good for most part, except last 3 pages. And I think it has the potential to get back on track. I for one found out something new on the "nice part of the thread".


    Now I'll make it pure and simple. This anti-american or anti-serb or anti-NATO or anti-whatever stuff violates the rules as severely as you can get. So next person who will dare to post any political bashing or any nationalistic statements will get a day's vacation. Especially this applies to =4c= Hajduk Veljko, nscode, D-Scythe, Ruggbutt. And can the latter two check their PM boxes please.


    Get on track and please grow up. At the moment some of you behave like children.





  7. Ok, I'm about to make a remark about the US president, but I'm not. Let's talk about the F-22, and not about horrible acts done by NATO planes and the Serb military for that matter.


    Are there any plans on updating the FBW software on the F-22? The thing seems really sluggish with it's 3:1 thrust ratio and l33t pilots, it couldn't even pull off a decent *C-WORD* *beep*, and the F-16 MATV could, so what's the matter with the FBW software? Fat cat dev crews not done enough work, or just some "safe flying" mode (not G and A0A restrictions, just a peacetime mode to minimize maintenance hours)?


    That's one of the problems with that machine... They invented special language to code in, and now noone knows how to program on it properly (since there are no manuals, and all of ppl who developed it are unavailable). therefore, control system is a bit of a dinosaur. It has an old core, but bits of new code added on for new systems, and ajustments to FBW system. Problem is, it's all not coded very well, plus new bits are in a slightly different language... I guess programmers forgot to allow assembler plugins! :D

    Overall, control system on F-22 resambles windows XP - quite new OS, yet has an old core... (P.S. that is before the SP1...:smilewink: )

  8. *****Abstract: In a nutshell 22 is likely to win in ideal world, subject to equal skill of the pilots*****


    Full Message

    Well, the tread turned out ok after all!


    Things ppl sayed about german MiGs exersize are true. There is even a video of F-18 with MiG-29 in his sights.


    I agree that the victor is the pilot who makes his opponent to fight by his rules. In ideal world at least.


    But then again, war will never happen in ideal world, nor will it go by ideal rules. I know how MiG would preform in random situations (scrambles, field airports etc), but I have no information about F-22 with that respect. In all-equal positions in fight between 29 and 22, 22 will probably win, but equal position fights rarely happen. Partially because fights happen over someones terretory, and that generally gives one side an advantage.


    Unfortunately, times of knights and duels are passed in most places, it's not how you win it, it's whether you win or lose. And by that theory, methods don't matter.


    Might seem like a lot of pointless words for most of you, but hopefully, some will understend what I'm trying to say.





  9. He-he, ok, give me my Fulcrum, you get the Raptor, and lets dance Pilotasso! Pilot is always the limiting factor...

    P.S. Gunzo, although unprobable in real life, will always be the true test for the better pilots. And when within VR, Raptors advantages are severely deminished...

  10. Hmm, where do I get this temptation to close the tread before it went downhill...


    Anyway as long as it's civil I don't mind.


    P.S. Don't really like F-22. It's expensive and controll system on that thing is a mutated dinosaur, which should be put out of its misery. Prefer Fulcrum myself :pilotfly:

  11. Yeh, there is very little chance of US war with Russia, and that's the only place where seawolfes might be needed. In Middle East 688I is fairly adequate, only threat there is Kilo and Kilo Improved, which, while being almost impossible to detect, will not detect 688I unless it's few hundret meters away goiung at decent speed. While against Russia you've got to deal with Akula II's, which are almost as silent as Seawolf (newest ones like Vepr And Gepard). There's also a couple of Borey's which should enter service within next couple of years, which would be even quieter. :)

  12. HungaroJET testers will not be able to give you answer you seek because of NDA... We are not allowed to make such comments. And noone from ED will be able to give you definite date, as if a new serious bug is found, release date can be put off for moths... After all ED will want release a complete, optimised product, which would require as little patches as possible. I furmly accept that it will be released when it is ready. And for me, it's good enough and serious answer.





  • Create New...