Gladman

Congrats. You're really going to love it.

I use a Rift and Voice Attack. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/1523496/

Well here's the thing. My squad rarely does a mission that doesn't require AA refueling, formation flying and carrier traps so for me, the TM throttle in the end was the way to go. The length of the throw (overall travel length) of the TM is longer and therefore you have the ability to make smaller corrections and maintain better overall control during intensive activity. Yes the X55 has more buttons and I do miss that but after a couple months you get used to it. I've never really been much of a P-51 guy but I will say that it is better overall for twitchy aircraft. (wait till you get your MFG's, oh my god the difference is insane). So yeah, you could setup your trims on the X55 easier but the TM does have one slidder you could use for that and maybe you could setup a hat switch for the other. Using the Target software, apparantly you can set a button to act the same as your three way switch on the X55. I haven't done it but the fellow I was talking to about it, I fly with on a regular basis so its for sure that it can be done. With that, you basically have the same abilities with the TM as the X55 with a different set of buttons. I preached Saitek for years but I have to admit that the TM Warthog system is overall better and with some time you will grow to realize it.

Maybe a hat switch could be used. I'm not sure about how you would go about it but it wouldn't be anywhere near as user friendly as rudder pedals. Especially those by MFG. I have a set and they are impressive.

Although I really have no issue with the implementation of such a "cheat" I most certainly would have them focus on about a hundred other things than this. Its a good idea, I get it, but I really think the focus should be on the Hornet, 2.5, and mission builders needs (or a dynamic campaign engine). To me, these things would bring more to DCS and this topic would be a very distant desire.

You really need to give VAC another try. I use it all the time and never have an issue. Can't imagine not having it. DWVAC is what I use. A little more costly but no issues.

Although I have gotten much better with AA Refueling than when I started I will say that your hardware and the curves you setup do indeed have a role in it. I have gone to a Warthog recently and I do find it easier (once I added the 10cm extension). Before that I used an X55 and to be honest it was always a great weight loss program. Patience in learning and etc are paramount, it can be done with most hardware I assume but in my experience, the better the hardware, the easier it is. Curves are a huge part of it and if you aren't using any check out this link. http://www.vvfa-2bountyhunters.com/gallery Its what I used with my X55 and am currently using with the Warthog. It may not be perfect for yourself but its a great starting point.

I see no reason the two systems wouldn't work together. They are independant USB connections. I prefer the button on the X55. I prefer the movement and throw of the TM. I haven't looked at the mid range throttle by TM. Seriously I'd just go all in and buy the Warthog.

I went from an X55 to a Warthog with a 10cm extension about a month ago. I've had no issues. Stiction is refering to hard to move feeling the TM stick has. Its sensitive but it does require a certain amount of force to start moving. The extension eleviates that completely in my opinion. To be honest, I'm very happy with the move. I really miss the amount of buttons on the X55 throttle but the stick is much more responsive and AA refueling as well as formation flying is easier because of it. The throttle also has a longer throw which allows for more accurate control. I'd suggest you would have the same success as myself. I'm not sorry I spent the money but it will take a bit to get used to the throttle.

Really well done. Amazing. That last 9 kill shot was epic!!!!

+1

Used Saitek Pro Pedals for sale. I used them for 2 years with no issue. http://www.saitek.com/uk/prod/pedals.html Product info in the link above. ] $180.00 Canadian plus shipping. My Postal Code is T0B2P0 for you to decipher shipping cost.

Very excited about this project. Really looking forward to it.

I also have this issue and I more than meet the system requirements. I'll post logs when I can. PS: desreguard what you see in my signature, there's been updates.

"The minions that abuse" So, again, you don't overclock so its not the right thing to do. You don't like Nvidia so its not the right thing to use. I can see you aren't willing to converse rationally so I'll do you a favor, I'll not respond to your ongoing rants. I've never said I would do anything other than try higher DP, not once did I say I knew it would work or that I for sure could achieve it. People have asked for the results I get and I will be sure to post them either way. Perhaps I'll get in contact with some of the "minions" you speak of who enjoy challanging new tech. But of course I'll never know who they are because yet again you post "facts" without links.

Pretty sure don't mean squat. Time will tell. And you saw in my previous post where I said I was shooting for 3 DP. 4 is probably too much right. If your going to talk on a topic, try to stay rational. Don't always go for the extreme. I don't think the 1080 is the be all, end all vid card and have never stated such.

Most notable would be my sore neck from twisting around during dogfights. Its simply increadible.

Hey look, relevent data. Here's the thing, you or I don't know what it will be able to do at this point. But if I can get 33 FPS at 2.0 DP on a GTX780, I'm willing to bet the 1080 will easily give me more than enough performance at 3 DP. 4 is probably too much but there is no denying the 1080 will perform extremely well. A 3 cylinder car (GTX780) will still get its arse handed to it by any 8 cylinder (GTX 1080)

Oh yea of little faith. I've been running 5760x1080 on a single GTX780 so why not. I may be wrong but its certainly a possibility. You've been constantly sceptical about the 1080 Skatezilla but I see little to no reason to belive it will be an extremely good product for DCS. Your comparissons to SLI/Crossfie items are mute, as are anything related to DX12. To be honest, I would prefer you stick to topics related to DCS.

I'm hoping I can run 3 or 4 pixel density to be honest. I'm ok with a few less fps.

Yes I am using a CV1. I have not received my GTX1080 yet but it is on order. What I can tell you now is that with close to max settings with a GTX780 I see 45-60 FPS. When I use the SDK utility for pixel density at 2.0, It drops to 33 FPS on average. In my opinion, flying with less than 2.0 pixel density is less than ideal. You have issues with reading smaller gauges and print. At 2.0, it is substancally better. Externally as well. Ground objects are hard to identify in ground clutter. At 2.0 DP it is substancally better. AA combat is frickin unreal. I mean, there are no words unreal. The Trackir just doesn't have the ability to provide the emersion the rift does. I run triple monitors and its not ever close. My neck was sore the next day from turning and twisting and keeping the eye on the target. You also feel where you are compared to the ground much better and make combat much more enjoyable. I could never go back to a screen.

I've been reading a number of the reports on the 1080 with the rift and the results look amazing. Considering I'm running a 780 right now and having decent success, the 1080 results should see a very smooth, high pixel density image. Can't wait for the 1080 to get here. Skatezilla, can you provide a link to the issues people are having with connection, my quick search didn't turn up anything.

Gotta agree Sobek, we don't have DX12.

DAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, I'll be adding an aftermarket water cooler when they become available for sure.