Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


About Kaktus29

  • Rank
  • Birthday 02/02/1982

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    LOMAC, Flaming Cliff,
  • Location
  • Interests
    Thinking, sporting, blogging,
  • Occupation
  1. its risky to fly so low and above terrorist groups but only if they are armed with modern Stinger manpads.. so unless US starts supplying Jabhat al Nusra (Al Qaeda) some modern manpads i think those choppers will not get down by AK-47 fire..
  2. NSA owns the Swiss air force Swiss have no control of their air force)lol.. Basically NSA encryption codes are given to Swiss on a weekly basis to enable their F-18 to have a navigation working. and every 2, 4 years F-18 are taken to US for re-programming without having access to what was re-programmed. Article is in German, you can translate it if you wish. http://mobile2.tagesanzeiger.ch/articles/55cc37f487da8ba4df000001
  3. it is a problem.. since you don't have the 1.5 but 1)) numbers win.. but even iraq 1991 war was heavily against iraq not just technological but numerical.. US coalition outnumbered the iraqis in warplanes department, helicopter, awacs, intel, etc.. it was not even a contest.. and after a gruelling 10 yrs war with Iran , iraq was shadow of what it could be.. what can i say, US played it superbly by supporting iraq into waging war against iran, thus weakening iraq and iran, and then hammering iraq afterwards.. now that is strategy.. tactics have little meaning when you loose strategic
  4. today especially in air warfare its all about hi-tech.. meaning lots of resources,financial and otherwise needed to maintain any level of ability to resist modern enemy air force.. ARH is just ARH far from game winner.. does the enemy have numerical advantage ? how about financial resource..can they fight war longer then you? do they have more cruise missiles then you have SAM missiles to shoot them down. can you develop those SAM missiles to replenish stock plus defend the factory that builds them?.. if no to all those answers then training your pilots to win enemy with arh while they don't h
  5. Reasons for developing AI is to control.. control societies much more effectively than ever.. those who have the economic and technological means to deploy such systems today is only US.. and the rest are afraid of it since if US manages to pull real AI breakthrough it will have effect of US developing nuclear weapon first and have monopoly.. thing is the country that develops AI first will be first..and no other can catch up.. AI won't allow it.. the first country that develops it becomes supremely powerful-industrially speaking, technologically. which means capital, funds from all ov
  6. for those naive tin foil heads who think NSA thing was a tin foil event-even with all the open evidence and reality, .. here is how to stop Win10 from spying from you IF you do choose to get an upgrade.. google : windows 10 is spying on you: how to stop it and click on first website.. it is plainly described the horror that is "free" win10.. an excerpt from Win10 Contract you agree to when downloading it to use: "Finally, we will access, disclose and preserve personal data, including your content (such as the content of your emails, other private communications or files i
  7. i don't like Win10 for simple reason, its a real NSA tool, what microsoft did with this "free" windows for all is bring you a big 'ol snoop program right to your nose.. from cameras, microphones, web site history, pictures, videos, passwords, it will now EVERYTHING.. and somehow we should trust it cuz ..you know..logic?!.. i'm just afraid they going to shut down Win7 support if not many ppl switch to "free" win10.. and simply force them to switch..
  8. Su35 is far more capable than Su27SM2.. thrust vectoring doesn't even begin to describe it.. it seems you don't know much of Su-35..from electronics to radar, to range,to engine, to datalinks,its a new plane compared to Su-27SM2 which is merely an upgraded Su-27 vannila for RFAF..
  9. @proof.. i agree, balance in term of Vietnam scenario should be if you are Vietcong to disrupt US side, if you manage to make F-4 bombing sortie to be aborted due to your side surprising and shooting 1-2 F-4 while other jettison ordnance it is 100% mission success.. and vice-versa for US to accomplish bombing while under fire (from SAM,Mig).. without breaching certain level of attrition.. but balance means it has a 50:50 feel as you do a mission..so your skill, and skill of your team can push it to 60:40 or more for your team..thus enjoying the kill,the success.. in that light i would l
  10. of course balance has to exist..this is a game after all, simulation per se would mean simulating all kind of difference scenarios ..lets say F-15 fighting 100 F-22..why not?.. we would "simulate" results..that is the real reason why simulators exist(either of machines or systems).. but would this be good in a game? who would fly a campaign of 2 F-15 fighting 100 F22..or 100 T-50 Pak-Fa.. balance is necessary, otherwise you have no challenge..you either loose or win easily.. US-Iraq in 1991 is way to easy for US side and way to hard on Iraqi side.. its boring to play either.. Ir
  11. @gg.. every project has "difficulties" .. what F35 has is beyond "difficulties" which even engineers who did it and managers who managed the project ADMIT.. you trying to change that narrative that developers themselves admit is beyond futile and silly.. to say RF should disband all air force just because they can't afford to pump 200 Pak-fa or that it has PROBLEMS which are SAME as F35 is ludicrous at best .. issue of technical miscalculation which f35 is becoming to lack of funds that pak-fa is becoming is two world apart.. so far nothing shows to disastrous engineering feat f35 d
  12. totally different circumstances regarding f35 and pak-fa.. in US its actually a messed up design that shows and nobody can argue against this.. and no money problem financing this disaster no matter how many "faults" they find.. in Russia completely different picture, its a sound design with great characteristics as it is, but problem financing due to financial war of the west on Russia.. so it makes sense to scale back-tactical retreat-to survive another day.. pak-fa is not needed on frontlines, .. if there is a war pak-fa or no pak-fa it won't make difference for anybody ..nor west nor RF..
  13. http://www.military-informant.com/airforce/8652-palubnye-vertolety-ka-52k-resheno-osnastit-protivokorabelnymi-raketami.html Use google translate for rough understanding but in general with the new radar Ka-52 can launch the new anti-ship missiles that Mig-29, Su-30 can launch.. so, ability to detect naval targets at distance up to 200 km and launch 200 range missiles at them.. also this makes it clear choppers don't have problems firing such missiles as they did have problems locating targets and feeding info to missile. once this is done, no problem exist for implementing "fire p
  14. as much needed break from the stupid price argument lets change the topic.. i for one am interested in more important AI aspects, not just in DCS in general but F-14 AI as well.. as complex as aircraft is don't you think AI needs to be upgraded for the plane?.. also we still lack overall AI improvement of DCS planes in groups.. before we get more modules i think its better to have AI that can group planes, analyse strength ratio of enemy versus friendly and initiate some sort of intelligent response.. I loose my interest when i see a Mig29 on CAP and EW telling him of a Awacs
  • Create New...