SchniX

I would pay for UH-1H update, no doubt

Why not both? an option than you can change

I know it's an old thread, but this question about the P-51D flaps is still concerns me till today and maybe today someone knows more about it? The big question for me is: do the flaps in the P-51D can be lowered at high speeds and stay extended or the airflow pushes the flaps inside like it's in DCS?...because in 2 another pretty realistic simulators it's not like in DCS, i'm talking about mainly A2A P-51D, but also about the P-51D in IL-2 Great Battles series. and in every sim it's modeled different, and i want to know which is more correct and how it's in real life. 1. DCS P-51D - flaps are depressed inside by the airflow at high speeds and cannot be jammed or break. 2. A2A P-51D - flaps can be extended at high speeds and at certain point the flap rod will be jammed and the flap will stuck and if you continue, eventually the flap rod will be break and the flap will remain attached to the wing, but moves freely. 3. IL-2 GB series P-51D - flaps can be extended at high speeds and at certain point the flap rod will be jammed and the flap will stuck as in the A2A P-51D, but the afterwards is different, the flap will also break, but in the way that it's completely cut off from the wing. Also, we have real life combat reports of P-51 pilots and in some of them they said that they used flaps at high speeds in order to not overshoot the enemy aircraft, even in very high speeds..for example: "I had to put down 20° flaps to keep from overrunning him, indicating above 500 m.p.h." and in DCS when i tried lowering flaps at 500 MPH they barely extend, something like 5 degrees. You can see the source here(near the bottom under: Use of flaps in combat): http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/mustang/combat-reports.html Off course we don't want it to be tested in real flight and to risk the pilot and the plane, but maybe someone with an access to a real P-51 can invenstigate how the system looks like inside the plane? Thx

Great!

I will try to explain again what i was suggesting, i mean that a bf-109K4 without MW50 will be more similar to G version relatively..i know it's not the same, but for now that we don't have the G version, it will be the closest way to simulate a more historic gameplay in the DCS WW2 servers.

I thought of an idea on how to make the DCS WW2 more authentic for now that we don't have the 109G variant yet. i think that choosing the MW/Fuel tank for Empty or B-4 fuel and disabling the option for MW50, will be simulating the Gustav close enough. so the majority of the German side should be like that, simulating the G variants, and only few slots should be K4 with MW50. This is the option in the ME: Thx

Great! Thx

MS FFB2

Hi, It's great that ED will improve the cockpit of the Ka-50. I would like that they will add the skin glossiness that the Ka-50 have in real life. in the sim the paint of the Ka-50 is too matte. Thx

Great!

I have the same problem with 1.5.4, force feedback works fine till suddenly it stops and the stick is soft. i'm flying with Microsoft force feedback 2.

Thx very much!

Great! :thumbup: Thx

Thx Devrim!

ED started working on AH-64A, but, there was no news about it for few years..i hope they are still working on it, together with the F-16C.