Gierasimov

Hi F-2, Sure, FF Sukhoi would be a welcomed addition to the DCS, no questions asked. Now. "Would probably", "slightly less draggy" should, would etc. won't cut it here. The most important thing is officially released documentation of the said airframe. To give you some perspective - when researching Cobra Whiskey, no such documentation was available and ED said "no, we can't", now that the documentation is available ED says "possible, down the line". The same is applicable to not only Sukhoi but ANY aircraft of ANY origin (maker, country, timeframe). It is much harder to do aircraft originated from Mikoyan or Sukhoi OKB due to the lack of officially available documentation that would allow ED to bring this into the game in as realistic setting as possible. The lack of such documentation might not necessarily function of secrecy but rather an ambivalent attitude towards releasing those.

Each map object can be set with zone - right click - assign zone - don't change anything in the default naming, size, etc. Then use triggers such as: bomb in zone (could be problematic a little) or zone object destroyed trigger, also with such zones MIST or other scripts can be utilized to "capture" the fact that map object was destroyed. Other than that, you can place a hidden (invisible to AI) soldier next to the building, or on top of it or whatever and have a trigger to register his death and deduct points. Also discussing Syria map is out of scope here so I won't comment more than point out the fact that Syria is coming with big update to destroyable objects - check its forum section and updates from MAESTRO.

I really love the work done with regards to visual damage model that you did for the A-10C II and Ka-50 III. Destroyed Hog is maybe too black but at least it is there, when shot down or otherwise. I wish you included your advanced damage modeling (like teased with WW2) and it's visual counterpart in the Fulcrum project from the EA phase.

Speaking of SC and tech, I wonder if the barricade net is still coming...

Yep, I don't mind original 9.12 and possibly would also be happy with MiG-29KVP experimental one, however proper K was derived from M so not going to happen before Flanker D or Frogfoot A (although NineLine already said Su-25 it ain't possible). Lets wait for DCS: Flanker 3.0 in my dreams at least

Air-To-Air Missile Development. We plan to migrate the R-27 (AA-10) family and R-73 (AA-11) missiles to a new component structure and flight dynamics. This will be coupled with a new proximity fuse model that accounts for Doppler closing speed, modified seekers, and a more realistic interaction model between the missile and the supporting radar. This will be done within the larger MiG-29 project framework. Other missile types will also be developed in the same way.

While it would technically be possible to do G variant (with NATO bits) I think in terms of avionics , K is absolutely out if reach right now otherwise we would be flying it. This was the last time we could land MiG-29K on a carrier:

Yep, me too! Absolutely and very needed Nice future for DCS!

Triplets then:

That is one of the best comments of appreciation I saw regarding Fulcrum. Fully agree!

From the newsletter: Air-To-Air Missile Development. We plan to migrate the R-27 (AA-10) family and R-73 (AA-11) missiles to a new component structure and flight dynamics. This will be coupled with a new proximity fuse model that accounts for Doppler closing speed, modified seekers, and a more realistic interaction model between the missile and the supporting radar. This will be done within the larger MiG-29 project framework. Other missile types will also be developed in the same way.

Relax, sometimes it's worth cross check info, and that's what I did. I did not attack neither of you guys, I appreciate all the efforts. Please take no offense as none was intended, written text sometimes conveys message without the emotions and sometimes that message can be taken with a lot of emotions. Important though is to convey facts at all times.

Well, would be lovely to actually see Bagram as well! Nevertheless, I pointed out Bagram misspeak to confirm it I wasn't going insane! Plot twist - ED modeled Bagdad airport on the Afghanistan map, simply coz Iraq and Afghanistan is one large map;)

Ahh... Got you now. Yep, true. Great job so far ED !

Don't worry, flight model will be tweaked / corrected if there is a need for it. Also, in that video Bagdad is being "sold" as Bagram, so who knows... As always, if there is public data to support any claims, including FM they will make it right, they are the best! In addition, remember that Fulcrum is the testbed for the new AI GFM (was it General Flight Model?) Which makes it even more exciting to wait for the future Fulcrum AI flight members

Thanks. I know the movie, not sure what's the relation to my appreciation of the Iraq map preview authenticity though.

Absolutely true NineLine, did not mean to finger point anyone, great map, great things coming to DCS.

So far I was only able to confirm "lazur" name with relation to either MiG-21 (-M) or MiG-23 (here it was already Lazur-SM)

I just went through the manuals again and no mention of automation between SAU-451 and E502-20, now thinking more about the Biryuza I am inclined to believe it would pose a technical challenge in late 70s' early 80s' to design a reliable way of remote controlling a fighter jet from the ground, nor it would make much of a sense anyways. Still, receiving cues on the HUD will bring interesting gameplay, however I do see that DCS has to develop the EWR concept / technology to be in position to integrate Biryuza within Fulcrum-A module, so hopefully at least after initial Early Access it will happen.

I am not sure why @Wags said it was Bagram, which seems to be repeated by @Silver_Dragon but nevertheless I must say that the quality of detail on the upcoming Bagdad airport looks rather promising. Well done ED terrain team, really nice piece of work in progress. Funny that neither of the experienced airmen could tell the difference, with at least Wombat putting a correct guess -

The only thing I found in the - I think forbidden - manual is referencing E502-20 “Biryuza” system as part of the 9.12 avionics. According to the manual, the pilot receives flight cues regarding target location and intercept course on the HUD/HDD. Autopilot section of the manual does not say anything about 9.12 flying itself to those cues or maybe I misinterpreted it?

Manual also says R-27 and R-73 can be used to attack unarmored high contrast ground targets. With the DCS better FLIR technology maybe this will be possible, right?

Both Poland and Ukraine use 9.12 so no problem at all to represent them in DCS.

HDD repeats what's shown in HUD depending on its mode. Both displays are part of the same system as @JetFighterGirl nicely summarizes above. Data link that you are looking for is the E502-20 “Biryuza”, short radio bursts that are sending commands to the aircraft updating it's target location which is displayed on the HUD and repeated on HDD. There is a bit of confusion at the moment if DCS: Fulcrum-A will feature E502-20 “Biryuza”, we need to wait for the reveal and features roadmap.

Nice to see the new tag "already in development"