Jump to content

Raven68

Members
  • Posts

    3443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Raven68

  1. In reference to Swiftwin9s post refer to this thread... https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=258579
  2. as providing the early early access to the actual module? Isn't the idea for them to have some play time or early peek so they can write up their experiences as a method to promote it? Mudspike is one of those that come to mind. Maybe it's not meant to mean that, but it's not clear, at least to me, at the moment.
  3. Was there ever any doubt? I have held my voice on the missed released windows because I understand this module is a beast to capture the physics, programming and integrating it into DCS World. I do, however, cringe when I see the statement about distribution to partners and social media channels. I feel that if it's good enough for them to get an early access copy why not those that have paid for early access and been dealing with the delays for 2 months IIRC. I don't know I just feel a little slighted.
  4. Not trying to undercut you DeathAngel but we might need to consider 3rd party status also. They may be trying to get the kinks out of their modules also. Trying to bring all these together at one time is a challenge in itself. :)
  5. Nice bump hein. I didn't notice the difference in how it slaves between the two, but I have not done any mission runs with the JSOW either. Nice find! :thumbup:
  6. Nice post! :thumbup: This is the type of post that comes in handy when trying to break it all down. I guess the main take away is to not undesignate as you step through each rack.
  7. To some degree you were right sir. I finally got it to work with 4 bombs instead of 8. My main issue was stepping to each station and undesignating and resetting the WPDSG. :doh: My method below... Set a waypoint for the area to attack and designate it (WPDSG) Leave QTY unspecified/none. Set each station to TOO mode by stepping through them. NOTE: If you have the waypoint designated, when you set each station to TOO it will snap to the designated waypoint. Enter jdam config screen, mission screen. Designate targets: TDC Depress DO NOT Undesignate/NoseWheelSteering Step Find next target TDC Depress Step Find next target TDC Depress Step Find next target TDC Depress Undesignate/NoseWheelSteering for last station. For my 4 bomb delivery I could then step through each station to verify the different coordinates set for each station. I provided a track below for anyone interested. It's a bit clumsy because I had to go back and designate the 3rd tank. I think it still think it may be worth while to use though. CAUCASUS_FA-18_GBU38_practice.trk
  8. Doesn't seem to apply anymore since the update to 2.5.6. The OP was updated before the first update to 2.5.6
  9. Track, video, step?? Please just don't just say yes!
  10. Is dropping multiple JDAM's by designating through the targeting pod even possible now...without hitting the same target of course. I am at a loss now.
  11. Welcome to DCS World, TVT!! Fifteen members stuurong in your group to develop the Eurofighter! And by the looks of the resume of the team so far, the module, I am sure,will be great!:thumbup:
  12. True! Just like how the Hornet has matured with new features being added, I am sure there will be a lot more detail to come and maybe a few surprises as the carrier module matures.
  13. Пока нет. I hope you can make it happen in the future. :)
  14. Hey BIGNEWY, Thank you for your response. I am pressing the key in the sim. I have not tried a key bind yet. BR
  15. Not sure if it's been reported as an existing problem, but the map scaling on the ABRIS initially scales opposite with the first press of the +/- keys on the map function. Sooo much improvement otherwise in the KA-50. Well done with the updates in VR!! :thumbup:
  16. The music for each individual module when setting the wallpaper seems to be the default DCSW music.
  17. I notice that for the torrent size. I switched to HTTP and it's 6+GB. The download is a hell of a lot faster also!
  18. Well done ED!! Yes we are in this together and this gesture helps. I see a module that is peaking my interest, but still enjoying what I have very much as the Ka-50 is a blast once again for me in VR!
  19. I will say this. ED do what's in your best interest, strike a balance to make sure there are no show stoppers and the OPEN BETA will be used what it's intended for to help flush out the problems and the community will hopefully understand and provide feedback to help continue improvement.
  20. So why answer questions there when you're likely to be torched for the smallest misspoken word as opposed to your home turf forums where it's more "tamed"?
  21. Depends on how long another few weeks is. There are many that have pre-paid and would like to see a return on their "investment". I am not saying I will be one of those that will be bringing the torch if there is a push out on the date, but there was an advertised time for release that some will likely get PO'd if missed. It has happened before.
  22. I was taking into account that we would get an update to the OB, as planned. And from that release the positive responses, if any, could be an indicator. If not, then all bets are off. :)
  23. Next week will be interesting to see if there have been significant strides made in the bug cleanup. If you see a lot of positive coming from the community then that could give an indication that we may see the super carrier released before the end of the month.
×
×
  • Create New...