Jump to content

Chapelmaggot

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Chapelmaggot

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday September 26

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS World Open Beta
    DCS World Stable
  • Location
    Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

217 profile views
  1. YES! I agree with everything you said 100%. I do believe the Hind is going to be amazing either way but obviously I'd love to see major improvements to infantry and ground units. That would elevate the Hind from amazing to really amazing. I totally agree!
  2. Fair enough, you're probably right. It's just that, with the Hind and other CAS helicopters coming to DCS, people are really hoping for such changes because they seem like the next step for Close Air Support missions. That's probably why there's a lot of discussion about these topics in the helicopter forums. Thanks for your help!
  3. I totally agree! In a thread discussing the Hind's role and potential in DCS ( https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/272632-hind-tempting-obviously-but-what-exactly-are-we-going-to-do-with-it/?tab=comments#comment-4676092 ), I have posted the following 2 comments. These fit in here perfectly so I'll just repost them. "Maybe I'm not educated enough to add to this thread so please excuse my somewhat uneducated opinion, but I feel like improvement to ground troops is necessary for the Hind to reach its full potential. We need more infantry, we need terrorists, we need small militia groups and
  4. Exactly. While writing my post, all I could think of was buzzing around the Syria Map with my Hind, scouting around the place and engaging where it is necessary. Right now, air-to-ground can be pretty damn frustrating. Even in the Hornet I sometimes feel frustrated because the ground units just don't... Well... Do anything dynamic. They sit there and shoot. You hit them with a GBU. So they scatter. Now they sit there and shoot. You hit them with 2 Mavericks. They scatter. They sit there and shoot. I don't know... It just doesn't feel... Well... Human (I'm not sure if this is the right word but
  5. Maybe I'm not educated enough to add to this thread so please excuse my somewhat uneducated opinion, but I feel like improvement to ground troops is necessary for the Hind to reach its full potential. We need more infantry, we need terrorists, we need small militia groups and insurgents (I'm talking about the 3d models here) but mainly, we need better AI. AI that's scared, intimidated, AI that will retreat, maybe even surrender. We need AI that "thinks" (or at least feels like it thinks) and acts depending on their chances of victory. Ground unit behavior and ground combat needs to be improved
  6. Hello there! This is my very first forum post and I want to address something rather important. While the Anton's cockpit is beautifully done, I - someone with German as their first language - have spotted a little typo on the "Kraftstoffpumpen"- or fuel pump-panel next to the pilot's right hip. There are 5 circuitbreakers on this panel and the most forward one has the label "Außenaschluß". This is most definetly a typo. The correct spelling would be "Außenanschluß". This circuitbreaker enables ground power to be connected with the aircraft. In German, the word "außen" means "outsi
×
×
  • Create New...