Q3ark
Members-
Posts
243 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Personal Information
-
Flight Simulators
DCS and FSX
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
DCS: F-4E - Episode IV - RADAR Pt. 1 - Basics and Theory
Q3ark replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-4 Phantom
I didn’t realise the huge gap in performance between the F4 and the F14, the tomcat, with its radar and datalink is light years ahead. I can see why it was so popular with crews in the fleet. With a good RIO the old cat can give modern jets a hard time. Don’t get me wrong, I’m excited to get my hands on the phantom , I can’t wait to see what heatblur have in store for us. -
Congratulations, you win at the internet today
-
Dude I'm not arguing with anyone, i wasn't even talking to you.
-
I am not picking sides or placing blame. This should have remained private and been resolved in the background, that's on razbam. Now it's out, as the owner of the IP ED is in a position to control the information coming out by making some kind of statement or update, helping set customers minds at ease and putting a stop to the uninformed speculation. That statement released by Nick Grey did nothing but fan the flames. These kind of disputes should be resolved at the lowest level possible, if Nick Grey is getting involved it's looking bad.
-
If a reduction in drama is what you want then it’s down to ED to make a statement, or post some updates regarding what’s going on, their intentions etc. Nobody here is an employee of either company, if they want to speculate in the absence of any official update then that’s up to them.
-
F-4E Phantom II Development Update and Release Delay Announcement
Q3ark replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-4 Phantom
In winter I run a taxing 3D application at maximum graphics to heat my room, does this count? -
I’m sure everyone saw that ED put up a video saying the chinook is up for pre-purchase, the timing sucks, it looks bad coming so close after this public bust up. I won’t be buying any first party DCS stuff until this gets resolved.
-
F-4E Phantom II Development Update and Release Delay Announcement
Q3ark replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-4 Phantom
I posted then thought twice, don’t want to cause a row or make stuff personal -
F-4E Phantom II Development Update and Release Delay Announcement
Q3ark replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-4 Phantom
I’m just getting bored of people trying to stir up drama where none exists, the whole idea that there’s some ulterior motive to the release delay or that “they” are lying to us is ridiculous.- 304 replies
-
- 15
-
F-4E Phantom II Development Update and Release Delay Announcement
Q3ark replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-4 Phantom
No you’re right there, they’re totally lying and making stuff up just to mess with you, it’s personal and you should ask for a refund and stop playing DCS entirely- 304 replies
-
- 16
-
From their press release about the delay Heatblur are aiming for May, if they don’t hit anymore problems I don’t see why we should be pessimistic about them getting it out by then.
-
They’re doing my head in, every patch lately seems to mess something up, six weeks between patches instead of four and still stuff gets through that shouldn’t
-
I thought they fixed that issue a few patches back, I’ll go through the change logs and see.
-
I think it's too early to be speculating about taking the module off sale, as soon as they do that it's all over, people will be screaming for refunds. Couple of weeks and this will all be a memory, they'll (ED and RB) have a chill weekend and come back to the table next week with cooler heads and sort it all out like adults.