Jump to content

MattCri

Members
  • Content Count

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About MattCri

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday 06/02/1987

Personal Information

  • Location
    Italy

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. ok, just copied your settings an started the track https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NoMqIHR8Qc_e7G6VUpca0EXkS9TnWeGw_gkAce7xYCQ/edit?usp=sharing average 33 fps, goes as low as 27. On my pc flat shadow is a marginal fps increase UTIL GPU SCLK GPU MCLK GPU TEMP GPU PWR GPU VENTOLA GPU UTIL. VRAM GPU FPS UTIL. CPU UTIL. RAM 100.27.00 1340.02.00 2000.00.00 71.58.00
  2. Thank you for the track, i made a detailed csv of the replay here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EkA0dBrXkHLVsssqXG-C3ZspiTgv-9LbhzHniZ7AUS0/edit?usp=sharing in short FPS: between 40 and 60 FPS. Average 48 RAM: ~26 GB was being used Vram: 8gb, all of it GPU: 60 to 100%, but average 98% CPU: between 11% and ~17%. Average 13% Resolution: 1920x1080 (no VR) Settings are a mix of medium-high without antialiasing Pc is: ryzen3600 / 32gb ddr4 3600mhz / rx480 8gb / dcs and pagefile on nvme ssd Not too bad i guess but t
  3. 1080p, i tried 900p a while ago and the performance increase was small. Not worth for me, 1080p without antialising is already a bit of a mess
  4. Well, like i said, i believe i am mostly GPU limited and yours is 2.5 to 3 times more powerful than mine and with more vram. Also Nvidia so much better dx11 drivers.
  5. just reading this thread it seems that 2.7 runs better if you have a high end gpu and a recent cpu and play at very high settings. Those who are struggling are the ones playing with medium-high settings at 1080p on lower end systems. My system is a bit old (ryzen 3600, 32gb ram, nvme ssd and rx480 8gb) most of the time i am gpu limited but i have the same -25 30% less fps that others are reporting here.
  6. how is performance with the last update? i have 32gb of ram and i was very confortable before now, especially with the a10 II i was just flying around in the instant action free flight in syria averaging 28gb, the peak was 31.2gb. Vram totally full too, 8.1 gbdcs.log
  7. well, now stable and open beta are the same, major performance loss included
  8. something changed for sure, now it crash before the loading just after pressing shift+r the error message is different 2021-05-27 18:08:12.737 ERROR VFS: VFS_open_write: CreateFile(): Unknown error 2021-05-27 18:08:12.737 ERROR DCS: can't open file dcs.log-20210527-180813.zip
  9. can confirm this, i have the same beahviour
  10. windows 10 pro version 19042.985 amd drivers 21.5.1
  11. crahing again here, im afraid deleting caches is not the solution
  12. We might be on to something here... So, there are 3 different shader cache: \AppData\Local\AMD\DxCache (and the nvidia equivalent here) \AppData\Local\D3DSCache \Saved Games\DCS.openbeta\fxo After deleting these caches and the fxo folder dcs regenerate fxo on first load and some new files are different. So far im not getting crashes, finger crossed. In amd/dxcache is immediately recreated a file around 8-9mb 015fc066da3d42e2bcbbd83cd59c3a0318fbc5187b53527d.bin, this is probabily caching dcs shaders
  13. i believe Forest Details Factor and Scenery Details factor, while not visible before, defaulted at 1.0 in 2.5. Trees visibility is bit different, even on the same setting (i use 85%) and i agree 2.7 is a tad better. Look, im not saying "2.7 is the same but much heavier" but for me, mostly because my gpu is a bit old, the increase in graphical fidelity is not worth the performance loss.
  14. caucasus free flight mission, empty mission and no new clouds. Same settings 80fps with 2.5 63fps with 2.7 Just looking up at the sky, same mission 2.5 140fps 2.7 100fps
×
×
  • Create New...