Hiob

As a rule of thumb, whilst take off or landing (or dogfighting) keep the RPMs at max. For cruise reduce them to 2400-2600

Just took a look at your track. Throttle up my guy! You are using the propeller rpm as a throttle and leave the throttle untouched. I think you have a misconception on how those work together. Think of your rpm (propeller pitch) as your gearbox. Low pitch/high rpm = low gear. High pitch/low rpm = high gear. You need the right gear (high rpm if you want to use power) and THEN stump on the gas! aka push the throttle forward. Flying the mosquito (and other warbirds without auto-rpm) is like driving a stick / manual gearbox car!

It‘s hopeless. People just want to wallow in misery. I give up.

Ok, just opened the instant action mission "take-off practise", took off, climbed, flew around a bit and landed. Everything works just fine - so there is no general issue right now that could cause OPs problems. My assumption (until we get a replay track) is, that either there are some double bindings or other reasons, that cause the propeller pitch/rpm to be low; or that the magnetos are switched off (or fuel).

The Mossie flies like any other Warbird. You need to have all the controls set up and applied correctly and learn the takeoff and landing behavior, but it is no more difficult than the others - generally speaking. Without seeing some footage I can only make assumptions. If rpm and manifold pressure are set correctly, check if flaps, undercarriage and bomb doors are stowed. Magnetos are on? Maybe double-bindings on the prop- and throttle controls?

Kann sein, kann aber auch sein, dass jemand einfach zu impulsiv ist. Da wir (nehme ich an) die Leute nicht kennen, bleibt wohl nur abzuwarten was passiert.

Me too!

Can you tell me the Lottery numbers for tonight please? That would be handy! Exactly! to quote myself from a different topic: „Some people just want to throw around negative assumptions just for the faint possibility they can eventually scream "See, told you!"....“ fits perfectly (again, unfortunately)

No, when you use headtracking, you are not limited to snapviews (unless you mean the angle limits that can be set in the server.lua). However in other modules there is a hard limit and you can’t stick your head through the canopy. In the Mossie that limit doesn’t exist and you can quickly find your head outside by accident.

Dude relax, nothing is written in stone yet. No need to get head over heels.

Nicht, dass das am Ende noch untergeht. Die Welt muss vor Unterdrückern der Redefreiheit (wie mir) gewarnt werden!

Whatever, the important part was - it is more than one. People are jumping to conclusions and in reality they don‘t know anything. It‘s a dispute between contract parties and they should solve it behind closed doors. The court of public opinion isn’t well suited for those matters. Razbams vague statement was semi-professional in my opinion, and forced ED into a reply (that I found equally „semi“ tbh). But from here on it should stay between them until solved. Even if that hurts our (mine for sure) curiosity.

https://discord.com/channels/542985647502393346/543014378643914752/1225540525029851146

https://discord.com/channels/542985647502393346/543014378643914752/1225540525029851146 Just a reminder that there are two sides to a story.

Nice!

FFS..... it's about time the sun comes out. People are in deperate need of some vitamine D to brighten up the mood.......

Windows 11 is 90% Windows 10 with a new paintjob anyway. Apart from the occasional "what the duck did they change that menu layout for...?!!" you won't even feel a difference. It needs the same treatment to get rid of the most obnoxious telemetry and bloat of course, but by now all the usual tools and information for that are up to date.

WHAT?! Say again....?

granted - I was only talking about flying. Weapons deployment I haven't done in a while.

If I understood correctly, the underlaying technique is not only used for the live manual but also for Jester and the crew chief functionality. So even if they skipped the manual part, the tech still needs to be fixed/finished.

Second this! In a way flat looks better anyway (less movement). Also when you use DLSS, (try balanced for extra fps), use the sharpening slider. 50-70% is fine. You can go even higher though. Sharpening doesn't cost performance and improves the looks with DLSS quite a lot.

I would bet on „none“. Rarely is a module released out of the blue without any build up. (You know, videos, articles, pre-order etc.)