Photon

Yea, I'm doing my tests on the free-flight PG, which spawns over Dubai. Never been able to get close to the numbers mentioned. Also, for my sake, seeing how often the FPS drops below 45 is more important than the average FPS, which might get skewed from looking at the sky mostly if in a dogfight or somesuch. If it can run around 60fps in areas with a lot going on, like over cities and such, that would be nice. However, I guess that requires a rather low resolution on my part

Yea, I agree on that :). Was just trying to find the magical setting, or something I had done wrong to get somewhere close to the FPS you achieved. So if I leave SteamVR global at 100%, and set per application resolution to 29%, then I'm getting more than 80fps myself, which seems to be the setting I was missing

I was just looking at post 1 and post 3. In post 3 he shows his global SteamVR setting, which is set to 54%, then in post1 there is the per application DCS settings which is set to 54% as well. If you reduce both of these, they multiply right? At least if I try to do the same thing:

This might have been mentioned somewhere in this thread before, but just so I understand. BN is running 54% both in global SteamVR settings, and the DCS per application settings. So that means his resolution is basically at around 29% ? That would explain why I could never get anywhere close to the fps in the first post

Hm. Got a 9900k myself, and my cpu never turns orange in fpsvr. Wonder if there's something fundamentally wrong somewhere in my setup

Yea. Same here. 50% in steam and low settings in dcs. Flying around Persian Gulf I get around 35-60 fps, so reprojection turns off a lot :/. Just in regards to op with the 2060, to not have big hopes of a smooth experience

Did you find any settings that changed your fps measurably? I also tried following BN settings, but get fps from 35-50, not even close to 90

I hope I'm doing something wrong, but I have a 2080 super, and can't get a good fps even with lower resolution and low graphics

Yea, I'm also running the reduced resolution as per the first post, but I'm not getting anywhere close to 90. Maybe flying over an empty ocean

Just got my own G2, and I've been looking forward to trying it out in DCS. Unfortunately, I can't get a good enough FPS to where it can run smoothly. I've copied all of the settings in the first post, but I can't get anywhere near to 90FPS (and this is only free-flight single-player). Been trying out free-flight in PG, but my FPS hovers around 45 (38-50), so I'm not getting a very good experience, and not high enough to get a stable reprojection going. My system is a 9900k, 2080 super, 32gb ram

Go back to complaining about the supercarrier, troll...

Been having the same problem. Playing the Exigent Riviera campaign, and the mission I'm at now has a night A2A refuel. With the NVG off, there's no light whatsoever. With the NVG on, either the nav-light on the tanker is like the sun, and I can see the rest of the tanker, or the light is OK, but nothing else is really visible. Not sure if gamma will help with this. Wish you could ask the tanker to turn external lights off :p

You can bind nosewheel steering. Single click turns it on, holding it turns nosewheel steering into "HI" mode where you shorter turn radius

Been doing this for a while now, and feel like I'm getting better. However, for some reason, even if I turn what feels like early (like abeam the island almost) and keep around 27-30 degrees angle of bank, I still manage to get a "too long groove" score. Not sure what I can do to fix it at this point

There's a nice mod for that :) https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3304451/

I get this all the time as well, and have watched streams of multiple other people getting the same. Seems to be a rather frequent occurrence

I always go straight for the basket myself. You're not a train, if you misjudge, you're thankfully in 3 dimensions ;)

If something sounds too good to be true...

Never mind, it's a 3rd party software. Just noticed when I tweaked some settings in it, that my exhaust also became a bit wonky. Disregard me then, I don't know what's happening :/

Are you using reshade?

Well said Baco

What I don't understand is the people who are opposed to the idea of something they don't have to turn on for themselves. As shown in a video on the previous page, one option is to have "heatseaking baskets" like it was way back when. Another rather easily implemented option is for the AI to take over your plane when you're in a nice position. None of these options should be extremely hard to code/implement as far as I can see.

Was that info with a citation? Like in the F16 page about the top speed, the citation is a reference to an af.mil document about the F16. What I quoted just seems to an old myth that refuses to die. Sure, when Wikipedia was young, using info from it would probably not go over well with your teachers etc, but the way it is now, it's a fine starting point to find what you need. If you're writing something you will get a grade on, using the actual cited sources is probably better, but for just finding info it's a nice source in itself. https://www.livescience.com/7946-wikipedia-accurate.html Just try to edit the page about Lions, and see how long that sticks. edit: btw in no way am I defending OP's crusade against "wrong" top speeds, nor do I see a need to change anything ingame...

It was at a 50% discount with pretty much everything else during the free month. Which was only 1 month ago..............

I bought it in May with a 55% discount. A mix of the discount at the time, and a GR promo code. $22.49