OldeDeus

I swear to god, people get so angry over muh “historical accuracy” :music_whistling: . If you dont want to use it then just dont equip it or play on servers that dont have it. Why take away the fun others might enjoy from having a more capable aircraft. Like from the looks of how popular multiplayer servers are, the casual ones are the most popular by a large margin. Call me a filthy casual as well but I really dont carry about timeframes of an aircraft if it can feasible use something with no additional software or modifications to the airframe. For example APKWS on the f16 would be cool, since all you need is a tpod and hydra pods capable airframe. This would expand the missions the aircraft can perform and thus increases the amount of fun i can with the aircraft. If it hurts you seeing a plane carrying it then its as simple as not equipping it. At the end of the day DCS is a game that strives to simulate various vehicles as realistic as possible in terms of performance and capabilities of the aircraft within the confines of the core game. Leaving us with a very nice sandbox for our hearts to enjoy to their content. Continuing with the sandbox metaphor, if one isnt happy with how someone is enjoying a part of the sandbox and it isnt resulting with its destruction. Then the simplest solution would be to ignore said person and go to another play area within. Hopefully people will understand where I am coming from, because at the end of the day its just my personal opinion and the final word sits with ED. I just made this post in support of the triple mavericks because i would be quite sad if they were removed, and as a general statement on how I view this game we all partake in. Have a nice day :thumbup: .

Had a rough landing with very little fuel, wasnt the greatest nor the gentlest of approaches. But i managed to get her down safely.

I mean, people get upset about this idea of frankenstein aircraft. But irl there are plenty of aircraft that do not adhere to a specific tape and block series. I think its fine if the jeff improves over time, since it means you can do more stuff with plane that is fun.

Its videos from GR like these that just handled so poorly and unprofessionally that makes me so sad. It was the same with the True Grit Technologies video, Cap complained about if the dev team were worried about it being overpowered and the like. Like common, I know its a game but at the same time its a sim. If you want balanced PVP then make join a server where the balance is closely monitored, otherwise stop trying to ruin whatever enjoyment people get from the module with your own biases. It frustrates me watching arguably one of the biggest channels in DCS reflect so poorly the game, themselves, and the community. I hope going forward ED and other dev teams just give them the cold shoulder, because obviously the channel doesnt even have the self respect to have a decent interview.

I have encountered the same issue with TMS right, it was working for a whioe but for some reason it doesnt anymore. Half the time it wont even add them as tracks even if its my own radar displaying them.

Yeah, I have been trying to use the LD10s on the GS server and they dont hit from even 35 miles at 35k feet M.95

Is the AGM 154b not going to get modeled? It is in the planned weapon list but its not listed in the poll with the other JSOW variants. Wish it did since the GB6 version is one of my favorite weapons on the Jeff. :(

Tbh having played the jeff alot, APKWS does tickle an itch that i would love to have on a blufor aircraft.

A working DGFT mode would make my day :thumbup: .