Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Didn’t buy anything during Summer Sale

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Hoffster View Post
    We're out of pitchforks, they are all being used in the F-16 threads, Two weeks without an update??!! how dare you....
    LOL

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by reece146 View Post
      ADF was fixed in the last month or so - probably some other stuff I forget - progress has been made.
      Are you sure? ADF was fixed?
      I didnt notice it in any changelog but maybe I miss something. Didnt try yet.
      Webmaster of www.yoyosims.pl
      sigpic
      Win 10 64, i9 9900k, GTX 2080Ti 11Gb OC, RAM 32Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3200MHz,, 3xSSD+2xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] HP Reverb v2 VR only

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by YoYo View Post
        Are you sure? ADF was fixed?
        I didnt notice it in any changelog but maybe I miss something.
        Yes,the ADF needle was fixed ( now the ADF audio is broken), it wasn't in the changelogs.

        https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.p...34#post4345934
        Last edited by Ramsay; 07-25-2020, 10:44 AM. Reason: Add link
        i9 9900K @4.7GHz, 32GB DDR4, RTX2070 Super 8GB, 1TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 1+1TB SSD, MSFFB2 joystick, X52 Pro Throttle, TIR5, Win 10 Pro x64, 1920X1080

        Comment


        • #19
          Nice to hear it, thx Ramsay.
          Webmaster of www.yoyosims.pl
          sigpic
          Win 10 64, i9 9900k, GTX 2080Ti 11Gb OC, RAM 32Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3200MHz,, 3xSSD+2xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] HP Reverb v2 VR only

          Comment


          • #20
            My understanding of the Yak52 is that it was developed for another private client and made available to ED's user base upon permission from them. My question then has to be: Is this other client getting a better, more finished version, or are they too having issues. If they purchased it for training, it stands to reason that they know this aircraft inside out and therefore must be fully aware of these issues. It kind of baffles my mind a little.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Zimmerdylan View Post
              My understanding of the Yak52 is that it was developed for another private client and made available to ED's user base upon permission from them. My question then has to be: Is this other client getting a better, more finished version, or are they too having issues. If they purchased it for training, it stands to reason that they know this aircraft inside out and therefore must be fully aware of these issues. It kind of baffles my mind a little.
              Speculation

              IIRC the original client (with a limited budget) required a clickable cockpit for training purposes, not a flyable DCS module - the flying portion of their program would likely be done in the real aircraft with the RL flight hours eventually counting towards a PPL, etc.

              AFAIK, having created the cockpit, avionics and 3D model, ED then got permission to add the flight model, etc. necessary to sell it to the public.

              Comment
              In some respects we are lucky to get the Yak-52 in DCS as, without the private client, ED would not otherwise have developed it for DCS. It's just a shame ED haven't been able to find/justify the resources necessary to bring it to the same level as the L-39/TF-52D in a timely manner.
              Last edited by Ramsay; 08-06-2020, 12:46 PM.
              i9 9900K @4.7GHz, 32GB DDR4, RTX2070 Super 8GB, 1TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 1+1TB SSD, MSFFB2 joystick, X52 Pro Throttle, TIR5, Win 10 Pro x64, 1920X1080

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Ramsay View Post
                Speculation

                IIRC the original client (with a limited budget) required a clickable cockpit for training purposes, not a flyable DCS module - the flying portion of their program would likely be done in the real aircraft with the RL flight hours eventually counting towards a PPL, etc.

                AFAIK, having created the cockpit, avionics and 3D model, ED then got permission to add the flight model, etc. necessary to sell it to the public.

                Comment
                In some respects we are lucky to get the Yak-52 in DCS as, without the private client, ED would not otherwise have developed it for DCS. It's just a shame ED haven't been able to find/justify the resources necessary to bring it to the same level as the L-39/TF-52D in a timely manner.
                To be honest, I really haven't flown it all that much. Maybe a few times when it was first released. I have always seen thread after thread complaining about it's incompleteness though.

                Comment


                • #23
                  YAK-52 work is still planned, but I don't have a time frame currently, the teams are still working from home and it has had a knock on effect for some plans.

                  As soon as I know for sure I will post news in this forum section.

                  thanks
                  BIGNEWY
                  Community Manager Eagle Dynamics

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    In the interview a couple of days ago, the ED CEO mentioned a few projects, but the Yak-52 was not one of them (REF).

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Ramsay View Post

                      It's just a shame ED haven't been able to find/justify the resources necessary to bring it to the same level as the L-39/TF-52D in a timely manner.
                      I thought we all paid for it no? At least I did, I double-checked and that money is definitely not on my account since a couple of years...
                      Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        At this point, I'd say its a loss.
                        "Still planned" after several years on a relatively easy aircraft, doesnt instill confidence of completion.
                        Be honest and just say its not a priority, nor will it be. Remove it from E/A and sell as is.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Just do as I do: no more purchases from ED until the Yak is finished.
                          The DCS Mi-8MTV2. The best aviational BBW experience you could ever dream of.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by msalama View Post
                            Just do as I do: no more purchases from ED until the Yak is finished.
                            Yeah, for me it works exactly like this, no more purchases until the following are finished:

                            - F-5
                            - F-18
                            - F-16
                            - Yak
                            - Harrier
                            - Viggen
                            - F-14

                            it'll be a while, lol.
                            Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X