gregzagk Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 (edited) POWERED BY "BUDDY SPIKE" www.buddyspike.net 24/7 Online Dynamic PvP Campaign for DCS World 1.5 Created by: Xcom , Greg, Crash, Ciribob SERVER NAME : 373vFS DCS GREECE SERVER SERVER STATUS : ONLINE FOR TESTINGROUND 7 OFFICIAL START : Saturday 28th May at 18:00 ZULU OFFICIAL END : Sunday 12th June at 21:00 ZULU Round 7 will be on the stable version of DCS World. It will run for 16 days if no other victory conditions occur first. REAL TIME WEB BASED MAP : http://gadget-buddyspike.rhcloud.com/ Check the Campaign's status on a real time basis. SOP - INFO : [ame]http://www.foinikas.org/ftp/public/DCS_World/Briefings/Buddy%20Spike/SOP%20OPERATION%20BLUE%20FLAG.pdf[/ame] We highly recommend you to place the autoexec.cfg file to your saved games/dcs/config folder for better connection in the server (less lag) as 104th & TAW proposed. Link: http://www.foinikas.org/ftp/public/DCS_World/Briefings/Buddy%20Spike/autoexec.rar autoexec.cfg file should include one of the following: For 8Mbit down and 2Mbit up: if not net then net = {} end net.download_speed = 1024*1024 net.upload_speed = 256*1024or For 2Mbit down and 1Mbit up: if not net then net = {} end net.download_speed = 256*1024 net.upload_speed = 128*1024Russian Version* needs to be updated : [ame]http://www.foinikas.org/ftp/public/DCS_World/Briefings/Buddy%20Spike/SOP_BLUE_FLAG_Round_2_RU.pdf[/ame] *Huge thanks to [HA]CiberAlex & [HA]Sonic for their kindly offer to translate it for the Russian community. "BUDDY SPIKE" WEBSITE: www.buddyspike.net Teamspeak IP: 89.163.173.82:1337 Password: RayGun BLUE HQ FORUM : http://www.buddyspike.net/forum/m/32856486/viewforum/6225142 RED HQ FORUM : http://www.buddyspike.net/forum/m/32856486/viewforum/6225137 REGISTRATIONS ARE OPEN DURING THE CAMPAIGN FEEL FREE TO REGISTER YOUR SQUADRON OR AS A LONEWOLF HERE : http://www.buddyspike.net/blueflagreg *Register and join www.buddyspike.net first Changelog for the 7th round - Air to Air missiles limitations: AIM-120C, R-27ER, R-27ET, R-77 Not available - Cluster bombs removed - Improved AI bombing script (more accurate) - Tweaks to improve reported lag issues based on feedback - Available Weapons : All Air to Air missiles except AIM-120B/C, R-27ER, R-27ET, R-77 Air to Ground: All A-G Weapons available except: Nuclear bombs Cluster bombs KH-58s Squadrons & Lonewolves Registered for Operation "Blue Flag" ROUND 7 LINK: http://www.buddyspike.net/members Forum signatures for the Operation "Blue Flag" created by 373vFS_Crash Enjoy! PLEASE POST IN THIS THREAD IN CASE THE SERVER CRASHES - OR REPORTED DOWN. Thanks in advance Edited June 2, 2016 by gregzagk "ARGO" DCS UH-1H DLC SP Campaign 373vFS DCS World squadron (Greece) - www.buddyspike.net "ARGO 2.0 Project Phoenix" UH-1H DLC Campaign - WIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
microvax Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Wow, that is fast, thank you so much, feared to be stuck with standard multiplayer again. Great work ! :)) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] *unexpected flight behaviour* Oh shiii*** ! What ? Why ? What is happening ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon_S Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Nice. Greg and Xcom PLEASE do something tonight for balanced start. Last round was started unbalanced 2:1 for blue, in early phase we start to lose and we never recovered. I suggest to RED and BLUE make start list 26:26 players and start sync. After that lets play with power what we have... Quote Немој ништа силом, узми већи чекић! MSI Tomahawk MAX | Ryzen 7 3700x | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | RX 5700 XT OC Red Dragon 8GB | VPC Throttle CM3 + VPC Constellation ALPHA on VPC WarBRD Base | HP Reverb G2 Youtube | Follow Me on TWITCH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuiGon Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Yes, back to the 80s! :thumbup: Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Rage* Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Very fast turnaround! Can I suggest we do an '88 scenario (or thereabouts) where its ER/ET vs Aim7 at some point? Might be good for Blue to wear the other shoe for once:) (Flamesuit on). [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostie Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Nice. Greg and Xcom PLEASE do something tonight for balanced start. Last round was started unbalanced 2:1 for blue, in early phase we start to lose and we never recovered. I suggest to RED and BLUE make start list 26:26 players and start sync. After that lets play with power what we have... Don't worry it was 2:1 when round 5 kicked off also, it is called balance. BuddySpike know Red are all powerful so must balance it up. :D "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 51st PVO "BISONS" Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tello Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 That SOP is so last round ! ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tello Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 It is a challenge! Accepted ! Wait, what? So AIM-120B will still be allowed? Versus R-27R/T? Is this a mistake, or a joke? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon_S Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 ...BuddySpike know Red are all powerful so must balance it up. :D That`s it? Ok, then. :D Quote Немој ништа силом, узми већи чекић! MSI Tomahawk MAX | Ryzen 7 3700x | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | RX 5700 XT OC Red Dragon 8GB | VPC Throttle CM3 + VPC Constellation ALPHA on VPC WarBRD Base | HP Reverb G2 Youtube | Follow Me on TWITCH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jejsus Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 It is a challenge! Accepted ! This is not a challenge, this is hitting the head against the wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4n Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Yes, PLEASE the 88s (ET vs AIM-7) scenario!! DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero.ger Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Yes, PLEASE the 88s (ET vs AIM-7) scenario!! no 'controlling' the Ka50 feels like a discussion with the Autopilot and trim system about the flight direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4n Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 And would be nice to have an AI script that'll fly a chopper with units to a airbase/FARP/city without defense (imagine at a point there isn't a single player in a team who has a transport chopper module...) DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VentZer0 Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 no yes. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VentZer0 Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Wow ... you go to bed and red still had most of PAK1 you wake up and its all over. Well, the running against the wall with our heads has finally ended. I would love to see the refuel runs being put back into the game as a major concern for both sides. Or the amount of fuel that a transport AI plane drops significantly reduced. Just to clarify, a transport drops 5000fuel and a spawn costs 50fuel, right? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
microvax Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 ET and ER are in russian service since 1990 to my knowledge, Aim120 is in service since 1991. So ET&ER vs AIM7 could only happen in mid 1990 I guess. And if 1990: Western Mig29 ))) Disclaimer: I dont know everything. Everything is subject to change. ;P [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] *unexpected flight behaviour* Oh shiii*** ! What ? Why ? What is happening ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey21 Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 (edited) I'd be okay with ER vs Sparrow, or ET vs 120B. I think asking for the full compliment of Russian missiles vs just Sparrows is a little bit silly. Edited May 28, 2016 by Monkey21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beeroshima Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 I'd be okay with ER vs Sparrow, or ET vs 120B. I think asking for the full compliment of Russian missiles vs just Sparrows is just a little bit silly. Right. Next red request: ER/ET vs sabres and hueys so some (not all) of red can get that taste out of their mouth. Sent while I should be working instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Rage* Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 It would be a realistic 88-90/91 scenario. Or are you takling about balance? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beeroshima Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 In all seriousness, I know it isn't feasible, but id love to see a scenario where we could flip flop sides but not everybody shares the sentiment, im sure. I'd love to see how the other side lives. I miss flying the flankers. Sent while I should be working instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roccoo Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 (edited) So it's 80s again? nice! Reduced missile range = closer dogfights = more fun! :thumbup: I think Blufor pilots will agree on this. Plus, semi-active vs semi-active is more fair! To Beer: you could switch sides for one round, many reds and blues did it! We are not as evil as you think :D Edited May 28, 2016 by roccoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey21 Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 It would be a realistic 88-90/91 scenario. Or are you takling about balance? Last round was a "realistic" modern scenario. Didn't stop people whinging. Trying to cherry pick dates that suit your team the best doesn't help anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Rage* Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 The whining never ceases from either side. Where does it say Red must always be the underdog? Since the BS team are open to community suggestions and they like to change each round a little I think its a good suggestion. And its realistic. The 104th do it occasionally on their server and it works well. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IASGATG Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 It would be a realistic 88-90/91 scenario. Or are you takling about balance? I'm completely okay with this if Russia doesn't get the A-10, the UH-1, the Gazelle, the M2K, KA-50 or the Su-25T. Obviously Bluefor would lose the A-10C, the SU-25, KA-50 and Mi-8. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Etherlight Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 I would like to know if it is true that Blue can use the 120B, but Red loses both the ER and the ET. Because if that is the case.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts