My personally models

Hey Ducky- I love these skin. Did you worked it out for the stock ED model - Great job looks excellent:thumbup: .

I have a problem for my skin - I wasn`t able to find a photo which shows me the inner rudders symbol . It looks like a circuit or a banno - Don`t know what it is .

Thank you guys - Best wishes,

TOM

59th_Reaper created skin :)

HELP:

TEXT: KECSKEMÉT DONGÓ REPÜLŐSZÁZAD

High resolution images for U

Hi,

is there somebody who wants to test the new MiG29?

Part1

http://remixshare.com/download/v6mlc

Part2

http://remixshare.com/download/mx6ym

Part3

http://remixshare.com/download/xbwza

Be carefully and make seafty copy first!

My very best wishes,

TOM

Test in progress. :-)

Yeah, i'll take this 29 model for a testflight, thanks TOMCATZ :)

Just had a quick flight, first thing that struck me was how straight and level the wings are, also the vertical stabs, see the following screenshots:

your model

stock ED model

other than that this model looks very good, i'll continue testing :thumbup:

Hi,

The GermanAirForceTechnicalOrder says 6° for the tip to the start of the edge. However- Thank you very much for testing guys :thumbup: Hope it works well, Best wishes,

TOM

I appreciate a lot your work Tomcatz but this 3D model has a wrong shape, almost in every part.

Look at this real Mig-29 UB photo, the cockpit frontal view is higher than the single version but you can see without doubt that the wings angle from the main fuselage, the vertical rear surfaces, the air intakes shapes, the canopy, are totally dfferent.

Really i enojy every one of your 3D models , but in this case the shape is wrong.

I get the feeling the fulcrum has a pretty "hard" wing so it should flex too much... I know in the Hornet though, the wing sits at about -4 on the ground but nearly level in the air. (Aeroelastic wing.)

Well first of all my initial impression is very good. The plane basic shape is a bit warp and different than the real but as aaron886 say it wasn't an easy shape.

I found some small mesh error. Also the airbrake hydraulics fix element is moving.. See attached pics

Well first of all my initial impression is very good. The plane basic shape is a bit warp and different than the real but as aaron886 say it wasn't an easy shape.

 

I found some small mesh error. Also the airbrake hydraulics fix element is moving.. See attached pics

Oh I meant a "hard wing" which is a term that means the wing is (relatively) inflexible. However that's not to say the MiG-29's wing would be easy to model. :)

Tomcatz, Does this version have AB?

Thank you guys - well I have to look after the small mesh errors. Thank you again,

Best wishes,

TOM

Ps: yes- Afterburner by ED ist still useable

@ luse:

Yo, you can use the original AB. But Tom created one himself. But there's one

problem:

We don't know the argument to animate the AB. Does anybody know the

number of the argument? It's the same as in LockOn (hope so). I will spend

a beer for the correct number :beer:

@Tom:

We must be careful in the air. Your damage-model is so cool that I like to crash

anytime:megalol:

CU at 09:00 p.m.

Regards

MadDoc

Hi Doc,

Ough yeah- we had a lot of fun at the last flight. It can post into the category "yes its a woman" :lol:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

We see us, buddy

We don't know the argument to animate the AB. Does anybody know the

number of the argument? It's the same as in LockOn (hope so). I will spend

a beer for the correct number :beer:

28/29. R/L.

Hi aaron886,

yes you`re right: 28 and 29 are the correct numbers for the nozzles. But thats not the right answer for the problem. Okay - I trye to explain : The afterburner is a selfstanding 3d model which use his own arguments to become bigger , longer and right back to out position. The name is "forsag.lom" .

In past it was possible to watch the models with the model viewer - but this tool will not work with Windows7 . So we are not able to find out the argument numbers for these model and I won`t have the chance to replace these model with a correct working new 3d model ...

However: Thanks for all helpings again - Best wishes and greetings,

Tom

Everyone still uses 28/29 to do this. Forsag cannot be moved where you want it, unfortunately, and it's a CMD model. Instead of making the burners "grow" out of the model, which induces see-through errors, use 5 or 6 visibility argument "stages" to make the burner expand somewhat seamlessly.

That's the best you can do...

WIP`s : Mavericks UB ...

Best wishes,

TOM

Where you get this model?

WIP`s : Mavericks UB ...

 

 

 

Best wishes,

TOM

Hi Mad Max,

well - It is nowhere to downloading because the status is WIP. But if you are interested I can send the files to you.

To Alf7 ,

I don`t know- The original MiG UB havent a radar but I`ll teplace the MiG - G. The reason is simply that the German MiGs where sold out to Poland for 1€ per aircraft in 2004. So I think it is th best ´way to repace these fighter and give him heaters as payload only.

Greetings,

TOM

PS: Today is formula One - Go Alonso :thumbup:

Yes, i very interested. Can you send me? We tested with our aerobatic team.

Go M Shumaher!

too interested in test this UB version :-)

WIP`s : Mavericks UB ...

 

 

 

 

Best wishes,

TOM

Oh Lord! This UB looks stunning!Tomcatz you should really release it soon i can imagine a Luftwaffe skin on it.. Replace the G rename it to GT..Here we are.:) Eye candy.Good job man..Really good job..

:music_whistling: