59th Ducky Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 (edited) Hey Ducky- I love these skin. Did you worked it out for the stock ED model - Great job looks excellent:thumbup: . I have a problem for my skin - I wasn`t able to find a photo which shows me the inner rudders symbol . It looks like a circuit or a banno - Don`t know what it is . Thank you guys - Best wishes, TOM 59th_Reaper created skin :) HELP: TEXT: KECSKEMÉT DONGÓ REPÜLŐSZÁZAD High resolution images for U Edited July 24, 2011 by 59th Ducky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMCATZ Posted July 27, 2011 Author Share Posted July 27, 2011 Hi, is there somebody who wants to test the new MiG29? Part1 http://remixshare.com/download/v6mlc Part2 http://remixshare.com/download/mx6ym Part3 http://remixshare.com/download/xbwza Be carefully and make seafty copy first! My very best wishes, TOM Born to fly but forced to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beczl Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Test in progress. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Yeah, i'll take this 29 model for a testflight, thanks TOMCATZ :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Just had a quick flight, first thing that struck me was how straight and level the wings are, also the vertical stabs, see the following screenshots: your model stock ED model other than that this model looks very good, i'll continue testing :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMCATZ Posted July 27, 2011 Author Share Posted July 27, 2011 Hi, The GermanAirForceTechnicalOrder says 6° for the tip to the start of the edge. However- Thank you very much for testing guys :thumbup: Hope it works well, Best wishes, TOM Born to fly but forced to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esac_mirmidon Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 I appreciate a lot your work Tomcatz but this 3D model has a wrong shape, almost in every part. Look at this real Mig-29 UB photo, the cockpit frontal view is higher than the single version but you can see without doubt that the wings angle from the main fuselage, the vertical rear surfaces, the air intakes shapes, the canopy, are totally dfferent. Really i enojy every one of your 3D models , but in this case the shape is wrong. " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron886 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 I get the feeling the fulcrum has a pretty "hard" wing so it should flex too much... I know in the Hornet though, the wing sits at about -4 on the ground but nearly level in the air. (Aeroelastic wing.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beczl Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Well first of all my initial impression is very good. The plane basic shape is a bit warp and different than the real but as aaron886 say it wasn't an easy shape. I found some small mesh error. Also the airbrake hydraulics fix element is moving.. See attached pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron886 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Well first of all my initial impression is very good. The plane basic shape is a bit warp and different than the real but as aaron886 say it wasn't an easy shape. I found some small mesh error. Also the airbrake hydraulics fix element is moving.. See attached pics Oh I meant a "hard wing" which is a term that means the wing is (relatively) inflexible. However that's not to say the MiG-29's wing would be easy to model. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luse Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Tomcatz, Does this version have AB? STT Radar issue is leftover code. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMCATZ Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Thank you guys - well I have to look after the small mesh errors. Thank you again, Best wishes, TOM Ps: yes- Afterburner by ED ist still useable Born to fly but forced to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDoc-VJS161 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 @ luse: Yo, you can use the original AB. But Tom created one himself. But there's one problem: We don't know the argument to animate the AB. Does anybody know the number of the argument? It's the same as in LockOn (hope so). I will spend a beer for the correct number :beer: @Tom: We must be careful in the air. Your damage-model is so cool that I like to crash anytime:megalol: CU at 09:00 p.m. Regards MadDoc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMCATZ Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Hi Doc, Ough yeah- we had a lot of fun at the last flight. It can post into the category "yes its a woman" :lol: Uploaded with ImageShack.us We see us, buddy Born to fly but forced to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron886 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 We don't know the argument to animate the AB. Does anybody know the number of the argument? It's the same as in LockOn (hope so). I will spend a beer for the correct number :beer: 28/29. R/L. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMCATZ Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Hi aaron886, yes you`re right: 28 and 29 are the correct numbers for the nozzles. But thats not the right answer for the problem. Okay - I trye to explain : The afterburner is a selfstanding 3d model which use his own arguments to become bigger , longer and right back to out position. The name is "forsag.lom" . In past it was possible to watch the models with the model viewer - but this tool will not work with Windows7 . So we are not able to find out the argument numbers for these model and I won`t have the chance to replace these model with a correct working new 3d model ... However: Thanks for all helpings again - Best wishes and greetings, Tom Born to fly but forced to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron886 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Everyone still uses 28/29 to do this. Forsag cannot be moved where you want it, unfortunately, and it's a CMD model. Instead of making the burners "grow" out of the model, which induces see-through errors, use 5 or 6 visibility argument "stages" to make the burner expand somewhat seamlessly. That's the best you can do... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMCATZ Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 WIP`s : Mavericks UB ... Best wishes, TOM Born to fly but forced to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAD MAX Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 Where you get this model? http://www.ukrfalcons.com [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic3246_1.gif[/sIGPIC] Сквад UVAF проводит набор пилотов на Су-27/МиГ-29/F-15. По всем вопросам обращаться в: http://www.ukrfalcons.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF7 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 WIP`s : Mavericks UB ... Best wishes, TOM Nice work TOMCATZ.No radar.What model MiG-27? Онлайн-MG:joystick: "Страшнее Шилки зверя нет". "ПИСДРУНС СС ПП". "Носи ППК с молоду-любить будешь до старости". "СА-Танки решают все!" "- А мы, старшина, ни за первую и не за вторую… Мы – за третью. За эту… За как её?.. За Родину!" __|77|________:::::: =}- \~~~~~~~~~/~~~~~~~ NAVAL AVIATION FAN ~~~~~~~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMCATZ Posted July 31, 2011 Author Share Posted July 31, 2011 Hi Mad Max, well - It is nowhere to downloading because the status is WIP. But if you are interested I can send the files to you. To Alf7 , I don`t know- The original MiG UB havent a radar but I`ll teplace the MiG - G. The reason is simply that the German MiGs where sold out to Poland for 1€ per aircraft in 2004. So I think it is th best ´way to repace these fighter and give him heaters as payload only. Greetings, TOM PS: Today is formula One - Go Alonso :thumbup: Born to fly but forced to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAD MAX Posted July 31, 2011 Share Posted July 31, 2011 Yes, i very interested. Can you send me? We tested with our aerobatic team. Go M Shumaher! http://www.ukrfalcons.com [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic3246_1.gif[/sIGPIC] Сквад UVAF проводит набор пилотов на Су-27/МиГ-29/F-15. По всем вопросам обращаться в: http://www.ukrfalcons.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS01_WinteR Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 too interested in test this UB version :-) WinteR | Virtual Smokey Bandits | Virtual Czech MiG-15UTI Solo Display Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryback Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 WIP`s : Mavericks UB ... Best wishes, TOM Oh Lord! This UB looks stunning!Tomcatz you should really release it soon i can imagine a Luftwaffe skin on it.. Replace the G rename it to GT..Here we are.:) Eye candy.Good job man..Really good job.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
59th Ducky Posted August 2, 2011 Share Posted August 2, 2011 :music_whistling: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts