Steel Jaw Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 F18c or F15c can only be what's coming next. Period. Of the two I'd like to see the more versatile Hornet. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, ASUS RTX3060ti/8GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Updated Tonka GR-4 Tornado Announced hahahahahaah that nickname will never leave it.... The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madone Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 That and multi-seat Apache, PLEASE! FTW!!! :thumbup: +1 I'm dreaming of that AH-64 every night ^^ Strike Posture Set CAS Center of Excellence Intel Core i5 4690k @4,6Ghz, Gigabyte GTX 970 OC, Gigabyte Z97-X, 16GB G Skill Sniper @2400, Samsung 860/850 EVO , Win 10 64 bits, Dual monitors 27"@144"Opentrack + TM Warthog + Saitek pro flight combat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge55 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 F18c or F15c can only be what's coming next. Period. Of the two I'd like to see the more versatile Hornet. I agree, much better choice. :thumbup: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] i7 10700K OC 5.1GHZ / 500GB SSD & 1TB M:2 & 4TB HDD / MSI Gaming MB / GTX 1080 / 32GB RAM / Win 10 / TrackIR 4 Pro / CH Pedals / TM Warthog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badger66 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 Outta the first page list , Im having 8 of those straight away . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frogisis Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Just wanted to add a quick perspective on this. Aircraft in general take time to make. Some military aircraft takes years if not decades to work on and test. So some groups are choosing to start with making trainers or low tech aircraft as a starting point. This gives them a good general indication of how to make more complex aircraft. Thanks for pointing this out - I was just about to post in this thread wondering why this was the case but it's a good thing I ran a search, first. Not that I begrudge anyone for wanting to fly trainers or other more unglamorous jets when theoretically anything is possible (my guess was that a lot of people had genuine soft spots for these planes either for their designs or nostalgia for their own training, or that here was a military market for getting cadets ready for trainers as well), but it does seem like an odd choice on the face of it. This makes it make a lot more sense, however. For when it goes wrong: Win10x64, GTX1080, Intel i7 @3.5 GHz, 32GB DDR3, Warthog HOTAS, Saitek combat rudder pedals, TrackIR 5 / Vive Pro, a case of Pabst, The Funk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick10 Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 P-47? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frogisis Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 (edited) P-47? YES. Though first I would like to see a BF-109 and an A6M Zero, then maybe a Spitfire. Then a P-38. Then an F-16. Then the entire Saab stable, from Draken to Gripen. Then maybe a Rafale. I don't really have the time or money for many more planes besides the ones we have now, and am waiting to see how the current crop turns out, but I would 100% buy a Gripen or a Rafale. Edited December 10, 2012 by Frogisis For when it goes wrong: Win10x64, GTX1080, Intel i7 @3.5 GHz, 32GB DDR3, Warthog HOTAS, Saitek combat rudder pedals, TrackIR 5 / Vive Pro, a case of Pabst, The Funk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeLKMT Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 P-47? Fw 190 or Bf 109 would be nice, so that Mustang can have some competition :) But I feel like we should keep this for wishlist thread rather than for this one. :beer: ■ L-39C/ZA Czech cockpit mod ■ My DCS skins ■ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkateZilla Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Some WIPs Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjeh Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 F18c or F15c can only be what's coming next. Period. Of the two I'd like to see the more versatile Hornet. You're forgetting F-16. It's used by ANG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjeh Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Some WIPs Looking good! :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave317 Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Updated Tonka GR-4 Tornado Announced The Tornado would be amazing (still miss DI's Tornado) but with all the other planes Razbam is doing i fear it will be years before we see anything and things could have moved on by then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eihort Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Well it's going to be years period. I'm curious though to see with just the task of adding aircraft (DCS has to divide its attention quite a bit), how fast these 3rd parties can produce. I'm also curious how having a lot of information already from producing for FSX (in terms of avionics and how the aircraft functions) will translate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I'm also curious how having a lot of information already from producing for FSX (in terms of avionics and how the aircraft functions) will translate. It won't...just because you know how a system works doesn't mean you know how to program it to work in DCS...there is going to be a big learning curve, especially as the more advanced (F-22, F-15E, Typhoon, etc) aircraft are developed. v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
159th_Falcon Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 True, but one doesn't have to research the system anymore if they already did so for FSX right? Hence freeing up some time for the actual coding/testing side of things? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] The keeper of all mathematical knowledge and the oracle of flight modeling.:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 True, but one doesn't have to research the system anymore if they already did so for FSX right? Hence freeing up some time for the actual coding/testing side of things? Maybe not research but coding for FSX is completely different than for DCS thus the learning curve and long development times...at least in my opinion... v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevdawg66 Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Bell UH-1H Huey photos http://www.dcs-fan.ru/gallery/gallery-dcs-world/dcs-uh-1h-huey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedrake42 Posted December 24, 2012 Author Share Posted December 24, 2012 any photos of the cockpit yet? http://www.youtube.com/bluedrake42 Subscribe to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevdawg66 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 (edited) Yes but i can't confirm that this is legitimate. Edited January 9, 2013 by kevdawg66 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevdawg66 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 http://www.fscommunity.info/2012/12/notams/#.UOzddneE5ao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodsPrototype Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Can someone correct the F-14D? They are only developing the F-14A not the F-14D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkateZilla Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Can someone correct the F-14D? They are only developing the F-14A not the F-14D I believe they said A First, and then MAYBE a D or something like that. Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaktus29 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 i guess F-14A is better since it would be modelled more correctly since its more obsolete than the D version.. i prefer as close to reality than less and more "new" version of the plane.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 It isn't about obsolete, just more documents available ... but, the main problem with F-14's is that it will be very hard to find people who can tell you how it works. Documentation is one thing, but documentation won't always tell you all the nuances, and some documentation like tactical manuals and weapon manuals remain classified, even for the F-14A. In particular, F-14's were destroyed to prevent Iran from getting their hands on F-14 parts via the black market (or so it is believed), so information for F-14's may be very hard to come by. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts