#05 - 15/7 STATUS UPDATE

Solution = Devrim

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1729969&postcount=2333

As you can see, it can vary quite a bit.

Thanks for info!

We chose the blueish tint because we had more photo reference of aircraft painted in this tone, especially the Serbian AF ones.

 

Out of hundreds of photos I'd say that there's a good mix between the two tones -- but considering most photos are contemporary, more of them are in the blueish tint.

As for me, this special green color is such an icon of soviet cockpits.

I had never seen export Migs, maybe for them blue cockpit was more usual.

Anyway thanks for update. Your Mig is a graet job.

so, but when you released the module?

This post will bring you up to date! http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=126299

Cobra, I suppose I might as well ask this fairly direct question more as a means to kinda clear up any possible remaining cause for confusion or misplaced hope.

Since there seems to be a lot of emphasis being put on 1.3.0 integration, is it safe to assume that we should not expect a release before 1.3.0 is out?

Cobra, I suppose I might as well ask this fairly direct question more as a means to kinda clear up any possible remaining cause for confusion or misplaced hope.

 

Since there seems to be a lot of emphasis being put on 1.3.0 integration, is it safe to assume that we should not expect a release before 1.3.0 is out?

They don't know what version they will release under. 1.2.9 is still possible.

Cobra, I suppose I might as well ask this fairly direct question more as a means to kinda clear up any possible remaining cause for confusion or misplaced hope.

 

Since there seems to be a lot of emphasis being put on 1.3.0 integration, is it safe to assume that we should not expect a release before 1.3.0 is out?

I'd say that is the more likely scenario. Not any kind of confirmation, however.

Cobra, I suppose I might as well ask this fairly direct question more as a means to kinda clear up any possible remaining cause for confusion or misplaced hope.

 

Since there seems to be a lot of emphasis being put on 1.3.0 integration, is it safe to assume that we should not expect a release before 1.3.0 is out?

You don't really expect an answer to that do you :megalol:

You don't really expect an answer to that do you :megalol:

Look who is laughing now.. :megalol::megalol:

Look who is laughing now.. :megalol::megalol:

Not sure I get it :doh:

Not sure I get it :doh:

Reread the thread.. The question WAS answered...

is there going to be a pilot body?

is there going to be a pilot body?

In a patch. We're looking into doing some animations for it too (like pulling the gear handle, and so on.)

In a patch. We're looking into doing some animations for it too (like pulling the gear handle, and so on.)

THAT would be awesome!

In a patch. We're looking into doing some animations for it too (like pulling the gear handle, and so on.)

I hope it will be optional though, I know many people love that feature, but I see it more like a fps hog, and a view obstruction :D

I hope it will be optional though, I know many people love that feature, but I see it more like a fps hog, and a view obstruction :D

+1

I prefer it to be togglable.

flare dispensers bolted on to fuselage (as in dispensers over shoulders of late MiG-23 and MiG-27 variants, Su-17 / 22 variants etc).

 

 

The catch with bolt on version is, when you equip them, you can't equip JATO devices if & when they are needed. Not too big of a problem if ask me :music_whistling:

Any pic of this system in the real aircraft?

Reread the thread.. The question WAS answered...

Was it. it was a direct question and the response was 'how shall I say it', less than direct.

In a patch. We're looking into doing some animations for it too (like pulling the gear handle, and so on.)

It's things like this that demonstrate just how much you put into this module. The attention to detail is just mind-blowing. I honestly think the MiG-21 will become THE standard by which all other modules will be compared.

In a patch. We're looking into doing some animations for it too (like pulling the gear handle, and so on.)

Just to make sure we understand, are we talking about an external or VC pilot model? If it is VC, please make it disable-able :]

In a patch. We're looking into doing some animations for it too (like pulling the gear handle, and so on.)

Aww SWEET!!!

Beating ED in their own field of work :thumbup:

Yes, correct -- bent/torn/crushed/extremely bent/missing. The texture is of course changing as well, in order to give definition and fidelity to the broken/damaged parts, and particularly the sculpted normalmaps provide a lot of extra fidelity. :)

And this will affect PFM right ? :)

In a patch. We're looking into doing some animations for it too (like pulling the gear handle, and so on.)

upcoming oculus rift customers will flock to this module..

In a patch. We're looking into doing some animations for it too (like pulling the gear handle, and so on.)

:thumbup::pilotfly: