Hummingbird Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 The Aerosoft FM does indeed look very impressive, I'll have to try it sometime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overvolt Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 The Aerosoft version is very good, and nao whit the TacPack como to work on P3D, i think will be better, because the updates the P3D recive. But LN version como to be the ultimate version for sure. I hope the guys can have a good development until Q4 and bring it further in 2015 as planned. Intel i7 7700K | ASUS MAXIMUN IX Hero | GSkill RBG 3000mhz 32G(4x8G) | MSI Trio 1080ti | 1x M.2 SSD Samsung 960PRO 512G | 1 x WesterDigital 4T | Corsair AX-850W | Monitor Alienware 34" aw3418dw | Oblisidian 800D |CORSAIR H80 | Teclado Logitech G15 |Mouse Razer DeathAdder Elite | Trackir 5 + Clip pro | Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog | Pedal MFG Crosswind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emg Posted April 10, 2015 Share Posted April 10, 2015 Ok, do we know what flight model is going to be used ? With the dynamic geometry of a swept wing aircraft is it too difficult to implement a PFM ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobek Posted April 10, 2015 Share Posted April 10, 2015 With the dynamic geometry of a swept wing aircraft is it too difficult to implement a PFM ? Certainly not. If i'm not mistaken, having onedimensional variable geometry will increase the dimension of the lift/drag/etc. lookup tables by one (so for example the table will go from 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional, though i guess in reality the orders will already be higher). From an implementation perspective, that's nowhere near unsurmountable. Obtaining the data that goes into the lookup tables, that's another matter entirely. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bumfire Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 I cant wait for this to be released, their mig21 module is amazing and if their f14 is as good as that, which I fully expect it will be, then in my opinion it will cement leatherneck sims status as the best third party module maker for dcs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradox Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 I cant wait for this to be released, their mig21 module is amazing and if their f14 is as good as that, which I fully expect it will be, then in my opinion it will cement leatherneck sims status as the best third party module maker for dcs. I really must agree, the MiG-21 is of unsurpassed (so far!) quality I would say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alejo68 Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 I really must agree, the MiG-21 is of unsurpassed (so far!) quality I would say. BIG +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayos Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 I really must agree, the MiG-21 is of unsurpassed (so far!) quality I would say. BIG +2 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Witchking Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 I really must agree, the MiG-21 is of unsurpassed (so far!) quality I would say. BIG +1 BIG +2 BIG +3 :p Not to mention I think Leatherneck has pushed the envelope to a point where they are seriously going to challenge ED at their own game with all the details and care they put into their modules. WHISPR | Intel I7 5930K | Nvidia GTX980 4GB GDDR5 | 16GB DDR4 | Intel 730 series 512GB SSD | Thrustmaster WARTHOG | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR4 pro | |A-10C|BS2 |CA|P-51 MUSTANG|UH-1H HUEY|MI-8 MTV2 |FC3|F5E|M2000C|AJS-37|FW190|BF 109K|Mig21|A-10:SSC,EWC|L-39|NEVADA| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackLion213 Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 BIG +3 :p Not to mention I think Leatherneck has pushed the envelope to a point where they are seriously going to challenge ED at their own game with all the details and care they put into their modules. BIG +4. I spend around 90% of my DCS time with the MiG-21 (though I am new to DCS), even though I had no special interest in the MiG-21 prior buying it. It's amazing work! -Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Low Blow Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 (edited) Leatherneck should be proud of what it achieved with the Mig 21 and for undertaking such a mammoth task with the F-14. It is devs like these guys that are making DCS the combat sim we have all wanted for years now. Bravo. Edited April 17, 2015 by Low Blow [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Twitch: <strong> </strong> My Specs: i7 8700K, 32gig Corsair DDR4 3000Mhz, 2080ti, Obutto R3volution, VKB Gunfighter Mk.III MCG Pro EN, Warthog Throttle, Saitek Combat Pedals, Oculus Rift S MMSOBGYTAST! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramazoti Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Geforce GTX 970 Inter Core I7 4790 CPU @ 4.00GHz 16.00 GB RAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7rooper Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 My respects to Leatherneck too. His first DCS modules is better looking and most stable than other's developers modules. My rig specs: Intel Core i7 4770 @3.4Ghz // Corsair 16GB DDR3 // MoBo Asus Z87K // HDD 1TB 7200RPM // eVGA Nvidia GTX 760GT 2GB DDR5 // LG 3D 47" 1920x1080 // Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS // Saitek Combat Pro Pedals // Thrustmaster MFD Cougar pack // PS3 Eye + FTNOIR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 I would add a +5, but I might be a tad biased. Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamovich Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 BIG +6 :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentGun Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 BIG +7 Leatherneck has made an outstanding product already. Every time I get in the MiG I think "wow these people have some amazing talent!" and I can't wait for what they will do with the F-14. Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales... :)The Future of DCS is a bright one:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greekbull Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Cobra, when we do get an update could you please let us know if the F-14B will be AG capable. All F-14Bs were strike aircraft from the 90s on(not many F-14Ds were made). I really would love to see that incorporated and many of us are wondering: )… I'll be getting it day one either way I'll just be a little less excited if it's AA only lol AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | ASUS Crosshair Hero X670E | 64GB G Skill Trident Z DDR5 6000 | Nvidia RTX 4090 FE| Samsung EVO Plus 6 TB M.2 PCIe SSDs | TM Hornet Stick/WinWing Hornet Throttle and MIP | VPC T-50 Stick Base | TM TPR Rudder Pedals W/Damper | Varjo Aero/Pimax Crystal VFA-25 Fist of the Fleet Carrier Strike Group One(CSG-1) Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AG-51_Razor Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 It's such a beautiful bird, I will get it day one regardless of what it 's role is, as long as it will have a carrier to operate off of. In fact, I will be throwing down my credit card as soon as y'all offer it up for pre-order!! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dekiplav Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 I say ... "not a pound for air to ground" or in this case "not a minute for air to ground" :music_whistling: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greekbull Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 I say ... "not a pound for air to ground" or in this case "not a minute for air to ground" :music_whistling: Well 1/2 of the F-14Bs life was spent as a multi-role strike aircraft and most of the combat missions it flew were strike missions.... Not to mention DCS doesn't have a single multi-role aircraft released(yet). As I said I'll fly it either way but I really hope the incorporate some strike ability... AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | ASUS Crosshair Hero X670E | 64GB G Skill Trident Z DDR5 6000 | Nvidia RTX 4090 FE| Samsung EVO Plus 6 TB M.2 PCIe SSDs | TM Hornet Stick/WinWing Hornet Throttle and MIP | VPC T-50 Stick Base | TM TPR Rudder Pedals W/Damper | Varjo Aero/Pimax Crystal VFA-25 Fist of the Fleet Carrier Strike Group One(CSG-1) Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dekiplav Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Well 1/2 of the F-14Bs life was spent as a multi-role strike aircraft and most of the combat missions it flew were strike missions.... Not to mention DCS doesn't have a single multi-role aircraft released(yet). As I said I'll fly it either way but I really hope the incorporate some strike ability... It's not that I would mind an A-G capable F-14B, it's just that LNS are already giving us two versions of the cat, and by my opinion this is the most difficult aircraft to model to this day (swing wings, dual cockpit, RIO AI, AIm-54, etc.) To model a Bombcat they need to redesign the back cockpit which will take more time. It is true that F-14B spent 1/2 of theirs life as an multi-role strike aircraft, but I will personally always feel that the A-G missions was taken only to prolong F-14's life. It is first and foremost an fighter aircraft witch his career peak was in the 80's and early 90's. For a true muti-role strike fighter that kicks F/A-18E butt, we will need a F-14D :smilewink:. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkateZilla Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 Cobra, when we do get an update could you please let us know if the F-14B will be AG capable. All F-14Bs were strike aircraft from the 90s on(not many F-14Ds were made). I really would love to see that incorporated and many of us are wondering: )… I'll be getting it day one either way I'll just be a little less excited if it's AA only lol Technically they were all A2G capable :) Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkateZilla Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 It's not that I would mind an A-G capable F-14B, it's just that LNS are already giving us two versions of the cat, and by my opinion this is the most difficult aircraft to model to this day (swing wings, dual cockpit, RIO AI, AIm-54, etc.) To model a Bombcat they need to redesign the back cockpit which will take more time. It is true that F-14B spent 1/2 of theirs life as an multi-role strike aircraft, but I will personally always feel that the A-G missions was taken only to prolong F-14's life. It is first and foremost an fighter aircraft witch his career peak was in the 80's and early 90's. For a true muti-role strike fighter that kicks F/A-18E butt, we will need a F-14D :smilewink:. The Strike Missions were given to the Tomcats because the F-18s didnt have the range due to drag from stores and shorter range. Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackLion213 Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 It is true that F-14B spent 1/2 of theirs life as an multi-role strike aircraft, but I will personally always feel that the A-G missions was taken only to prolong F-14's life. It is first and foremost an fighter aircraft witch his career peak was in the 80's and early 90's. For a true muti-role strike fighter that kicks F/A-18E butt, we will need a F-14D :smilewink:. Actually, all it needs is a LANTIRN pod. :) The Hornet pilots seem to freely admit this :D. The new MFD came along after the integration of LANTIRN, though it did significantly improve the efficacy of LANTIRN (bigger screen means seeing more). -Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dekiplav Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 (edited) Can anyone upload a F-14B RIO pit modified with MFD? Because I kinda mix tings up a little bit. I cant seem to find anything online. Thanks in advance! Edited April 23, 2015 by dekiplav Typos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts