greg765 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Looks incredible, can't wait for it :) Good luck for your development ! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slamelov Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 It's an area that we would like to possibly explore way down the road, you never know what may be possible in the future. That could be great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Arrow Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Any news here with progress with L-39? The thread has become too quiet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaze Posted November 25, 2012 Author Share Posted November 25, 2012 (edited) New external mesh for the C model, thanks to DGambo. Screens of aircraft are all work-in-progress and do not represent the final aircraft or content. Edited December 1, 2012 by Blaze 1 i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaze Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share Posted November 28, 2012 (edited) More testing of the new external model. Pilot is currently a place-holder, and even more detail is being added to the airframe almost every day. Bare-metal textures for testing purposes only. ;) Screens of aircraft are all work-in-progress and do not represent the final aircraft or content. Edited December 1, 2012 by Blaze i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 That looks awesome. [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jiri01 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 As a czech man I will definitely buy it when it is released. You made my day guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PE_Tigar Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 WTG gentlemen - looks awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pepin1234 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 great, I like it [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuky Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 very very nice! Me like! :D No longer active in DCS... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaze Posted December 1, 2012 Author Share Posted December 1, 2012 While the L-39ZA is the primary focus of our module, we are also working on a C variant that will focus more on the initial training of aircraft systems (and maybe someday dual-seat training). We are also considering including civilian aerobatic and racing versions as extras. Here's a popular L-39 that visits my hometown airshow every year, N139PJ "Angel 7". Also, a WIP of a start to increasing engine exhaust detail. Screens of aircraft are all work-in-progress and do not represent the final aircraft or content. 1 i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sotosev Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 beauty:smilewink: System specs below Case - Antec Three Hundred PSU - Corsair AX750watt Board - MSI Z170A GAMING PRO CPU - Intel i5 6600K 3900MHz Cooler - CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Plus Memory - Kingston HYPERX 16G DDR4 2400Mhz CL15 Graphics - MSI GEFORCE GTX 980 GAMING 4G SSD - Samsung 950 PRO 256GB M.2 NVMe Monitor - Philips 277E 27" 1920x1080 60Hz OS - Windows 10 Home 64bit Flight Controllers - Thrustmaster HOTAS WARTHOG, Saitek COMBAT RUDDER PEDALS, TrackIR 4, Track Clip Pro [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kusch Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Amazing! Give me "flying telephone pole" (SA-2)! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaze Posted December 1, 2012 Author Share Posted December 1, 2012 Click for full-res. Screens of aircraft are all work-in-progress and do not represent the final aircraft or content. i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weta43 Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Looking good :) Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaltys Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Great pictures, guys! AFAIK, L-39s are not carrying UB-32 - they are capable of carrying only UB-16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolle Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 why don't you have your own third-party sub-forum Amazing pictures. :thumbup: Quick question: why don't you have your own third-party sub-forum? Would make it easier to follow your progress... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Intel Core I7 4820K @4.3 GHz, Asus P9X79 motherboard, 16 GB RAM @ 933 MHz, NVidia GTX 1070 with 8 GB VRAM, Windows 10 Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaze Posted December 2, 2012 Author Share Posted December 2, 2012 (edited) Amazing pictures. :thumbup: Quick question: why don't you have your own third-party sub-forum? Would make it easier to follow your progress... We will in time. Just need to further development on the cockpit first, then we will have our own section. What We're All About. Edited March 15, 2013 by Blaze i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaltys Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 What L-39ZA your team is going to model? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BHawthorne Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 While the L-39ZA is the primary focus of our module, we are also working on a C variant that will focus more on the initial training of aircraft systems (and maybe someday dual-seat training). We are also considering including civilian aerobatic and racing versions as extras. Here's a popular L-39 that visits my hometown airshow every year, N139PJ "Angel 7". Also, a WIP of a start to increasing engine exhaust detail. Screens of aircraft are all work-in-progress and do not represent the final aircraft or content. Was that the L-39 that caused the licensing issues with the Navy? Cool paint scheme but the story behind that is interesting too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 That image show more armament with ED put on the L-39, can explain them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVKSniper Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Hi guys, I don't want to critisize your work, but unfortunately I have to. This is how it turns out when a man does a thing he saw just on a photo and has no understanding of how it really works. Blaze, you have once written about UB-32 loaded on L-39: "Normally yes but they can also carry UB-32s in special cases." :doh: UB-32 CAN'T be loaded on the L-39ZA in no way! These words come from a real L-39ZA pilot, who flies the jet in our Air Force (commanding officer of a squadron to be precise). The pylon doesn't have the ability to attach a UB-32 bomb. Pylon are compatible with UB-16 only!:):) And if we were talking about planes in USA: there are not many planes of the type and if there are, they are demilitiarized to be allowed to fly in civil aviation. Here is my question: how do you want to work on the ZA version? We are really looking forward to your module of L-39, and we will buy it, but you can expect a tough review of it. But so far it seems to me that it will be rather disappointing for the fans of this plane. Support my work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4n Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Question: what are those four different bombs in the 2nd picture up there? All just explosive ones? What are their differences? :) DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaltys Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 (edited) Hi guys, I don't want to critisize your work, but unfortunately I have to. This is how it turns out when a man does a thing he saw just on a photo and has no understanding of how it really works. Blaze, you have once written about UB-32 loaded on L-39: "Normally yes but they can also carry UB-32s in special cases." :doh: UB-32 CAN'T be loaded on the L-39ZA in no way! These words come from a real L-39ZA pilot, who flies the jet in our Air Force (commanding officer of a squadron to be precise). The pylon doesn't have the ability to attach a UB-32 bomb. Pylon are compatible with UB-16 only!:):) And if we were talking about planes in USA: there are not many planes of the type and if there are, they are demilitiarized to be allowed to fly in civil aviation. Here is my question: how do you want to work on the ZA version? We are really looking forward to your module of L-39, and we will buy it, but you can expect a tough review of it. But so far it seems to me that it will be rather disappointing for the fans of this plane. Man, don't be so harsh on guys who are our only hope to get L-39 into DCS. They will get their job well done! Edited December 7, 2012 by Zaltys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burner_Tbird2 Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 This is how it turns out when a man does a thing he saw just on a photo and has no understanding of how it really works. Try the final product, since all that's been posted here so far is pictures ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts